Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Nov;128(11):2131-42.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2585-y. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding

Affiliations
Review

Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding

Yong-Bi Fu. Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Maximizing crop yield while at the same time minimizing crop failure for sustainable agriculture requires a better understanding of the impacts of plant breeding on crop genetic diversity. This review identifies knowledge gaps and shows the need for more research into genetic diversity changes under plant breeding. Modern plant breeding has made a profound impact on food production and will continue to play a vital role in world food security. For sustainable agriculture, a compromise should be sought between maximizing crop yield under changing climate and minimizing crop failure under unfavorable conditions. Such a compromise requires better understanding of the impacts of plant breeding on crop genetic diversity. Efforts have been made over the last three decades to assess crop genetic diversity using molecular marker technologies. However, these assessments have revealed some temporal diversity patterns that are largely inconsistent with our perception that modern plant breeding reduces crop genetic diversity. An attempt was made in this review to explain such discrepancies by examining empirical assessments of crop genetic diversity and theoretical investigations of genetic diversity changes over time under artificial selection. It was found that many crop genetic diversity assessments were not designed to assess diversity impacts from specific plant breeding programs, while others were experimentally inadequate and contained technical biases from the sampling of cultivars and genomes. Little attention has been paid to theoretical investigations on crop genetic diversity changes from plant breeding. A computer simulation of five simplified breeding schemes showed the substantial effects of plant breeding on the retention of heterozygosity over generations. It is clear that more efforts are needed to investigate crop genetic diversity in space and time under plant breeding to achieve sustainable crop production.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of the spatial and temporal changes (solid line and some highlight in red) in crop genetic diversity generated by modern plant breeding with variable goals and methods (a) and how they are obscured (broken line) under diversity assessments of variable nature (b) (color figure online)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Predicted heterozygosity (H t) over generations for an allele of various characteristics (a neutral alleles; b recessive allele; c additive allele; and d dominant allele) under genetic drift and/or selection in a finite population of size N. The prediction for neutral allele (a) was obtained from the Eq. (1) and the predictions for bd from the Eq. (2). The predictions in bd are specified at a selective locus with two allele frequencies (q = 0.1, 0.4), two population sizes (N = 20, 50), two selection coefficients (s = 0.1, 0.2), and three levels of dominance [h = 0 (recessive), 0.5 (additive), and 1 (dominant)]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Breeding schemes (a) and parental heterozygosity (H o) changes (b) over 20 generations in simulated breeding programs to improve a quantitative trait of interest. The simulation considered five breeding schemes (Self = selfing; Half-sib = half-sib; SH = selfing + half-sib; HS = half-sib + selfing; HSH = half-sib + selfing + half-sib) and generated 50 diploid progeny in each generation with 5000 loci. The first 20 loci control the trait with four genetic models considered [neutral (s = 0, h = 0), recessive (s = 0.2, h = 0), additive (s = 0.2, h = 0.5), and dominant (s = 0.2, h = 1)]. The progeny with the largest genetic values were selected as parents for crossing and the parental heterozygotes were counted over 5000 loci. Environmental variation and its interactions with genotypes were not considered

References

    1. Allard RW. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. J Hered. 1988;79:225–238. - PubMed
    1. Allard RW. Principles of plant breeding. 2. New York: Wiley; 1999.
    1. Aremu CO. Genetic diversity: a review for need and measurements for intraspecies crop improvement. J Microbiol Biotech Res. 2011;1:80–85.
    1. Arunachalam V. A study of inbreeding in some models of artificial selection. J Genet. 1974;61:87–107. doi: 10.1007/BF02984075. - DOI
    1. Babiker EM, Gordon TC, Chao S, Newcomb M, Rouse MN, Jin Y, Wanyera R, Acevedo M, Brown-Guedira G, Williamson S, Bonman JM. Mapping resistance to the Ug99 race group of the stem rust pathogen in a spring wheat landrace. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128:605–612. doi: 10.1007/s00122-015-2456-6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources