Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 9;30(7):853-866.
doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1027235. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Involvement of prefrontal cortex in scalar implicatures: evidence from magnetoencephalography

Affiliations

Involvement of prefrontal cortex in scalar implicatures: evidence from magnetoencephalography

Stephen Politzer-Ahles et al. Lang Cogn Neurosci. .

Abstract

The present study investigated the neural correlates of the realisation of scalar inferences, i.e., the interpretation of some as meaning some but not all. We used magnetoencephalography, which has high temporal resolution, to measure neural activity while participants heard stories that included the scalar inference trigger some in contexts that either provide strong cues for a scalar inference or provide weaker cues. The middle portion of the lateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 46) showed an increased response to some in contexts with fewer cues to the inference, suggesting that this condition elicited greater effort. While the results are not predicted by traditional all-or-nothing accounts of scalar inferencing that assume the process is always automatic or always effortful, they are consistent with more recent gradient accounts which predict that the speed and effort of scalar inferences is strongly modulated by numerous contextual factors.

Keywords: magnetoencephalography; pragmatics; prefrontal cortex; quantifiers; scalar implicature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Left: mean percentages of “yes” responses (indicating lower-bounded or non-pragmatic readings); error bars represent ±2 × SE (the standard error of the by-subject means). Right: histograms of the subject means for some and only some items (averaged across upper-bounded and lower-bounded contexts).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Current estimates for regions showing FDR-significant or -marginal interactions. The time window of the significant cluster is highlighted in grey, and the upper left portion of each plot shows the spatial location of the vertices comprising that region. SOME_all: some in the “all” (upper-bounded, strongly inference-supporting) context; SOME_any: some in the “any” (lower-bounded, only weakly inference-supporting) context; ONLYSOME_all: only some in the “all” (upper-bounded) context; ONLYSOME_any: only some in the “any” (lower-bounded) context.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbey A., Koenigs M., Grafman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex. 2013:1195–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barr D., Levy R., Scheepers C., Tily H. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language. 2013:255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bemis D., Pylkkänen L. Simple composition: A magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011:2801–2814. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5003-10.2011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benjamini Y., Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics. 2001:1165–1188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-114. - DOI
    1. Bergen L., Grodner D. J. Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2012:1450.. doi: 10.1037/a0027850. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources