Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection
- PMID: 26248504
- DOI: 10.1007/s10730-015-9291-7
Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection
Abstract
How may clinical ethics committees (CECs) inspire ethical reflection among healthcare professionals? How may they deal with organizational ethics issues? In recent years, Norwegian CECs have attempted different activites that stretch or go beyond the standard trio of education, consultation, and policy work. We studied the novel activities of Norwegian CECs by examining annual reports and interviewing CEC members. Through qualitative analysis we identified nine categories of novel CEC activities, which we describe by way of examples. In light of the findings, we argue that some novel working methods may be well suited to promote ethical reflection among clinicians, and that the CEC may be a suitable venue for discussing issues of organizational ethics.
Keywords: Clinical ethics; Ethics committee; Organizational ethics.
Similar articles
-
Clinical Ethics Committee in an Oncological Research Hospital: two-years Report.Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):1217-1231. doi: 10.1177/09697330231174529. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Nurs Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37326119 Free PMC article.
-
Roles and responsibilities of clinical ethics committees in priority setting.BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 1;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0226-5. BMC Med Ethics. 2017. PMID: 29191186 Free PMC article.
-
Importance of systematic deliberation and stakeholder presence: a national study of clinical ethics committees.J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):66-70. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105190. Epub 2019 Sep 5. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 31488518
-
Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09986-9. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Med Health Care Philos. 2021. PMID: 33219898 Free PMC article.
-
Training clinical ethics committee members between 1992 and 2017: systematic scoping review.J Med Ethics. 2020 Jan;46(1):36-42. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105666. Epub 2019 Sep 16. J Med Ethics. 2020. PMID: 31527139
Cited by
-
Falling on deaf ears: a qualitative study on clinical ethical committees in France.Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Dec;22(4):515-529. doi: 10.1007/s11019-019-09907-5. Med Health Care Philos. 2019. PMID: 31147810
-
Descriptions of long-term impact from inter-professional ethics communication in groups.Nurs Ethics. 2023 Jun;30(4):614-625. doi: 10.1177/09697330231160007. Epub 2023 Mar 15. Nurs Ethics. 2023. PMID: 36920799 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Ethics Committee in an Oncological Research Hospital: two-years Report.Nurs Ethics. 2023 Nov-Dec;30(7-8):1217-1231. doi: 10.1177/09697330231174529. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Nurs Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37326119 Free PMC article.
-
Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK.HEC Forum. 2021 Dec;33(4):371-391. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09416-6. HEC Forum. 2021. PMID: 32696205 Free PMC article.
-
Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0438-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31856803 Free PMC article.