Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
- PMID: 26252170
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000888
Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia
Abstract
Background: Studies in a variety of disciplines have shown that the readability of Web-based patient education materials is above that of the sixth grade reading level recommended by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability, content, and quality of English- and Spanish-language patient education materials addressing neuraxial labor analgesia.
Methods: The websites of 122 U.S. academic medical centers with obstetric anesthesia divisions were searched for English- and Spanish-language patient education materials. Readability of English-language patient education materials was assessed with 3 validated indices: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook. Readability of Spanish-language patient education materials was assessed using the Spanish Lexile Measure. A 1-sample t test was used to evaluate the mean readability level against the recommended sixth grade reading level. A scoring matrix was developed to evaluate the content of patient education materials. Website quality was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print.
Results: We identified 72 English-language and 29 Spanish-language patient education materials. The mean readability levels of all patient education materials were higher than the recommended sixth grade reading level using all indices (Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 9.1 ± 1.9, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook: 8.6 ± 1.4, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook: 11.8 ± 2.1; P < 0.001 for all). All patient education materials discussed the benefits of neuraxial analgesia. However, only 14% (upper 95% confidence interval: 24%) discussed contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia. Postdural puncture headache and hypotension were the most commonly addressed complications (92%). All other complications were addressed by less than half of patient education materials. Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Print scores were consistent with poor website understandability (median score, 64%; interquartile range, 64-73).
Conclusions: The mean readability of Web-based patient education materials addressing neuraxial labor analgesia was above the recommended sixth grade reading level. Although most patient education materials explained the benefits of neuraxial analgesia, possible contraindications and complications were not consistently presented. The content, readability, and quality of patient education materials are poor and should be improved to help patients make more informed decisions about analgesic options during labor and delivery.
Similar articles
-
The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.Cardiol Young. 2020 Mar;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X. Epub 2019 Dec 26. Cardiol Young. 2020. PMID: 31875800
-
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25654639
-
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Acad Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25488695
-
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016. PMID: 27605695 Review.
-
Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients.BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025173. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025173. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30872547 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States.Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):690-693. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Nov 28. Am J Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 33259825 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparity in the Administration of General Anesthesia.Anesth Crit Care. 2024;6(4):68-76. doi: 10.26502/acc.073. Epub 2024 Oct 28. Anesth Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 39811572 Free PMC article.
-
The readability of online English and Spanish patient education materials on anaesthesia for orthopaedic surgery.BJA Open. 2025 Mar 27;14:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100388. eCollection 2025 Jun. BJA Open. 2025. PMID: 40230790 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Receipt of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350825. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50825. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38194235 Free PMC article.
-
What Patients Look for When Browsing Online for Pancreatic Cancer: The Bait Behind the Byte.World J Surg. 2018 Dec;42(12):4097-4106. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4719-2. World J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29971463
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical