Selection and Evaluation of Tissue Specific Reference Genes in Lucilia sericata during an Immune Challenge
- PMID: 26252388
- PMCID: PMC4529112
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135093
Selection and Evaluation of Tissue Specific Reference Genes in Lucilia sericata during an Immune Challenge
Abstract
The larvae of the common green bottle fly Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae) have been used for centuries to promote wound healing, but the molecular basis of their antimicrobial, debridement and healing functions remains largely unknown. The analysis of differential gene expression in specific larval tissues before and after immune challenge could be used to identify key molecular factors, but the most sensitive and reproducible method qRT-PCR requires validated reference genes. We therefore selected 10 candidate reference genes encoding products from different functional classes (18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, actin, β-tubulin, RPS3, RPLP0, EF1α, PKA, GAPDH and GST1). Two widely applied algorithms (GeNorm and Normfinder) were used to analyze reference gene candidates in different larval tissues associated with secretion, digestion, and antimicrobial activity (midgut, hindgut, salivary glands, crop and fat body). The Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa was then used to boost the larval immune system and the stability of reference gene expression was tested in comparison to three immune genes (lucimycin, defensin-1 and attacin-2), which target different pathogen classes. We observed no differential expression of the antifungal peptide lucimycin, whereas the representative targeting Gram-positive bacteria (defensin-1) was upregulated in salivary glands, crop, nerve ganglion and reached its maximum in fat body (up to 300-fold). The strongest upregulation in all immune challenged tissues (over 50,000-fold induction in the fat body) was monitored for attacin-2, the representative targeting Gram-negative bacteria. Here we identified and validated a set of reference genes that allows the accurate normalization of gene expression in specific tissues of L. sericata after immune challenge.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Sherman RA, Hall MJ, Thomas S (2000) Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions. Annual review of entomology 45: 55–81. - PubMed
-
- Cazander G, Pritchard DI, Nigam Y, Jung W, Nibbering PH (2013) Multiple actions of Lucilia sericata larvae in hard-to-heal wounds: larval secretions contain molecules that accelerate wound healing, reduce chronic inflammation and inhibit bacterial infection. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology 35: 1083–1092. - PubMed
-
- Vilcinskas A (2011) From Traditional Maggot Therapy to Modern Biosurgery In: Vilcinskas A, editor. Insect Biotechnology: Springer; Netherlands: pp. 67–75.
-
- Davydov L (2011) Maggot therapy in wound management in modern era and a review of published literature. Journal of pharmacy practice 24: 89–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
- Actions
- Actions
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
