Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov;80(6):963-973.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0696-3. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis

Affiliations

Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis

Christina J Mueller et al. Psychol Res. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

Affective flanker tasks often present affective facial expressions as stimuli. However, it is not clear whether the identity of the person on the target picture needs to be the same for the flanker stimuli or whether it is better to use pictures of different persons as flankers. While Grose-Fifer, Rodrigues, Hoover & Zottoli (Advances in Cognitive Psychology 9(2):81-91, 2013) state that attentional focus might be captured by processing the differences between faces, i.e. the identity, and therefore use pictures of the same individual as target and flanker stimuli, Munro, Dywan, Harris, McKee, Unsal & Segalowitz (Biological Psychology, 76:31-42, 2007) propose an advantage in presenting pictures of a different individual as flankers. They state that participants might focus only on small visual changes when targets and flankers are from the same individual instead of processing the affective content of the stimuli. The present study manipulated face identity in a between-subject design. Through investigation of behavioral measures as well as diffusion model parameters, we conclude that both types of flankers work equally efficient. This result seems best supported by recent accounts that propose an advantage of emotional processing over identity processing in face recognition. In the present study, there is no evidence that the processing of the face identity attracts sufficient attention to interfere with the affective evaluation of the target and flanker faces.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013 Jun 17;9(2):81-91 - PubMed
    1. Exp Psychol. 2013;60(6):385-402 - PubMed
    1. Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 17;3:243 - PubMed
    1. Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jul;72:162-95 - PubMed
    1. Neuroreport. 2002 Mar 25;13(4):427-31 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources