Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov 1;25(21):4802-4807.
doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

Cheminformatic comparison of approved drugs from natural product versus synthetic origins

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cheminformatic comparison of approved drugs from natural product versus synthetic origins

Christopher F Stratton et al. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. .

Abstract

Despite the recent decline of natural product discovery programs in the pharmaceutical industry, approximately half of all new drug approvals still trace their structural origins to a natural product. Herein, we use principal component analysis to compare the structural and physicochemical features of drugs from natural product-based versus completely synthetic origins that were approved between 1981 and 2010. Drugs based on natural product structures display greater chemical diversity and occupy larger regions of chemical space than drugs from completely synthetic origins. Notably, synthetic drugs based on natural product pharmacophores also exhibit lower hydrophobicity and greater stereochemical content than drugs from completely synthetic origins. These results illustrate that structural features found in natural products can be successfully incorporated into synthetic drugs, thereby increasing the chemical diversity available for small-molecule drug discovery.

Keywords: Cheminformatics; Natural products; Physicochemical properties; Principal component analysis; Synthetic drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Approved drugs 1981–2010
NCEs from 1981–2010 are binned in five-year groups and displayed in three series: total approved drugs (●), small molecules (■), and biologics (▲).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Small-molecule drug approvals between 1981–2010 parsed by compound class
NCEs are binned in five-year periods and displayed as percentages of total small-molecule drug approvals in each time interval. (a) NCEs parsed as drugs based on natural product structures (i.e.: natural products (NP), natural product-derived (ND), natural product-inspired synthetics (S*, S*/NM)) versus drugs from completely synthetic origins (S, S/NM). (b) Drugs based on natural product structures parsed by individual compound classes.
Figure 3
Figure 3. PCA plots of drugs approved between 1981–2010 parsed by compound class
Data from a single analysis are shown on four separate PCA plots defined by the first two principal components, PC1 vs PC2, for (a) natural product drugs (NP), (b) natural product-derived drugs (ND), (c) natural product-inspired synthetic drugs (S*, S*/NM), and (d) completely synthetic drugs (S, S/NM).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Component loadings for the PCA
Vectors on the loading plot indicate the relative influence of each structural and physiochemical descriptor on the placement of molecules on the plot of PC1 vs PC2.

References

    1. Munos B. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:959. - PubMed
    1. Scannell JW, Blanckley A, Boldon H, Warrington B. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012;11:191. - PubMed
    1. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Hansen RW. Cost to develop and win marketing approval for a new drug is $2.6 billion. http://csdd.tufts.edu.
    1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:461. - PubMed
    1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J Nat Prod. 2012;75:311. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances