Solvent dependent photosensitized singlet oxygen production from an Ir(III) complex: pointing to problems in studies of singlet-oxygen-mediated cell death
- PMID: 26255622
- DOI: 10.1039/c5pp00230c
Solvent dependent photosensitized singlet oxygen production from an Ir(III) complex: pointing to problems in studies of singlet-oxygen-mediated cell death
Abstract
A cationic cyclometallated Ir(III) complex with 1,10-phenanthroline and 2-phenylpyridine ligands photosensitizes the production of singlet oxygen, O2(a(1)Δ(g)), with yields that depend appreciably on the solvent. In water, the quantum yield of photosensitized O2(a(1)Δ(g)) production is small (ϕ(Δ) = 0.036 ± 0.008), whereas in less polar solvents, the quantum yield is much larger (ϕ(Δ) = 0.54 ± 0.05 in octan-1-ol). A solvent effect on ϕ(Δ) of this magnitude is rarely observed and, in this case, is attributed to charge-transfer-mediated processes of non-radiative excited state deactivation that are more pronounced in polar solvents and that kinetically compete with energy transfer to produce O2(a(1)Δ(g)). A key component of this non-radiative deactivation process, electronic-to-vibrational energy transfer, is also manifested in pronounced H2O/D2O isotope effects that indicate appreciable coupling between the Ir(III) complex and water. This Ir(III) complex is readily incorporated into HeLa cells and, upon irradiation, is cytotoxic as a consequence of the O2(a(1)Δ(g)) thus produced. The data reported herein point to a pervasive problem in mechanistic studies of photosensitized O2(a(1)Δ(g))-mediated cell death: care must be exercised when interpreting the effective cytotoxicity of O2(a(1)Δ(g)) photosensitizers whose photophysical properties depend strongly on the local environment. Specifically, the photophysics of the sensitizer in bulk solutions may not accurately reflect its intracellular behavior, and the control and quantification of the O2(a(1)Δ(g)) "dose" can be difficult in vivo.
Similar articles
-
Singlet-oxygen-mediated cell death using spatially-localized two-photon excitation of an extracellular sensitizer.J Phys Chem B. 2012 Aug 30;116(34):10234-46. doi: 10.1021/jp304954m. Epub 2012 Aug 15. J Phys Chem B. 2012. PMID: 22857396
-
Effect of sensitizer protonation on singlet oxygen production in aqueous and nonaqueous media.J Phys Chem A. 2007 May 31;111(21):4573-83. doi: 10.1021/jp066843f. Epub 2007 May 5. J Phys Chem A. 2007. PMID: 17480060
-
A luminescent poly(amidoamine)-iridium complex as a new singlet-oxygen sensitizer for photodynamic therapy.Inorg Chem. 2015 Jan 20;54(2):544-53. doi: 10.1021/ic502378z. Epub 2015 Jan 2. Inorg Chem. 2015. PMID: 25554822
-
Singlet Oxygen Photophysics: From Liquid Solvents to Mammalian Cells.Chem Rev. 2024 Sep 11;124(17):9949-10051. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00105. Epub 2024 Aug 6. Chem Rev. 2024. PMID: 39106038 Review.
-
Photosensitized generation of singlet oxygen.Photochem Photobiol. 2006 Sep-Oct;82(5):1161-77. doi: 10.1562/2006-03-03-IR-833. Photochem Photobiol. 2006. PMID: 16683906 Review.
Cited by
-
Azadioxatriangulenium and Diazaoxatriangulenium: Quantum Yields and Fundamental Photophysical Properties.ACS Omega. 2017 Jan 24;2(1):193-203. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00211. eCollection 2017 Jan 31. ACS Omega. 2017. PMID: 31457221 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources