Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jul 30:10:4837-46.
doi: 10.2147/IJN.S87585. eCollection 2015.

Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review

Rachel Anne Kornhaber  1 , Loyola M McLean  2 , Rodney J Baber  3
Affiliations
Review

Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review

Rachel Anne Kornhaber et al. Int J Nanomedicine. .

Abstract

Health professionals publishing within the field of health sciences continue to experience issues concerning appropriate authorship, which have clinical, ethical, and academic implications. This integrative review sought to explore the key issues concerning authorship from a bioethical standpoint, aiming to explore the key features of the authorship debate. Studies were identified through an electronic search, using the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus databases of peer-reviewed research, published between 2009 and 2014, limited to English language research, with search terms developed to reflect the current issues of authorship. From among the 279 papers identified, 20 research papers met the inclusion criteria. Findings were compiled and then arranged to identify themes and relationships. The review incorporated a wide range of authorship issues encompassing equal-credited authors, honorary (guest/gift) and ghost authorship, perception/experiences of authorship, and guidelines/policies. This review suggests that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' (ICMJE) recommended guidelines for authorship are not reflected in current authorship practices within the domain of health sciences in both low-and high-impact-factor journals. This devaluing of the true importance of authorship has the potential to affect the validity of authorship, diminish the real contributions of the true authors, and negatively affect patient care.

Keywords: ICMJE; authorship; bioethics; equal credit; ghost; honorary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision trail of included studies describing the ethical concerns of authorship.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Walker R, Sykes L, Hemmelgarn B, Quan H. Authors’ opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marusic A, Bosnjak L, Jeroncic A. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagena EJ. The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(5):308. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bennett D, Taylor D. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg Med. 2003;15(3):263–270. - PubMed
    1. Welker JA, McCue JD. Authorship versus “credit” for participation in research: a case study of potential ethical dilemmas created by technical tools used by researchers and claims for authorship by their creators. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(1):16–18. - PMC - PubMed