What repeated measures analysis of variances really tells us
- PMID: 26257845
- PMCID: PMC4524931
- DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.4.340
What repeated measures analysis of variances really tells us
Abstract
This article examined repeated measures analysis of variance (RMANOVA). Within-subjects repeated measurements are unavoidable during clinical and experimental investigation, and between- and within-subject variability should be treated separately. Only through proper use and meticulous interpretation can ethical and scientific integrity be guaranteed. The philosophical background of, and knowledge pertaining to, RMANOVA are described in the first half of this text. The sphericity assumption and associated issues are discussed in the latter half. The final section provides a summary measure analysis, which was neglected by P value-dependent interpreters.
Keywords: Data interpretation; Repeated measurements; Sphericity condition.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

References
-
- Park E, Cho M, Ki CS. Correct Use of Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance. Korean J Lab Med. 2009;29:1–9. - PubMed
-
- Wilkinson GN, Rogers CE. Symbolic description of factorial models for analysis of variance. Applied Statistics. 1973;22:392–399.
-
- Potthoff RF, Roy S. A generalized multivariate analysis of variance model useful especially for growth curve problems. Biometrika. 1964;51:313–326.
-
- Dexter F. Checklist for Statistical Topics in Anesthesia & Analgesia Reviews. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:216–219.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources