Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep 1;113(5):699-705.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.278. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments

Affiliations

A Bayesian adaptive design for biomarker trials with linked treatments

James M S Wason et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Response to treatments is highly heterogeneous in cancer. Increased availability of biomarkers and targeted treatments has led to the need for trial designs that efficiently test new treatments in biomarker-stratified patient subgroups.

Methods: We propose a novel Bayesian adaptive randomisation (BAR) design for use in multi-arm phase II trials where biomarkers exist that are potentially predictive of a linked treatment's effect. The design is motivated in part by two phase II trials that are currently in development. The design starts by randomising patients to the control treatment or to experimental treatments that the biomarker profile suggests should be active. At interim analyses, data from treated patients are used to update the allocation probabilities. If the linked treatments are effective, the allocation remains high; if ineffective, the allocation changes over the course of the trial to unlinked treatments that are more effective.

Results: Our proposed design has high power to detect treatment effects if the pairings of treatment with biomarker are correct, but also performs well when alternative pairings are true. The design is consistently more powerful than parallel-groups stratified trials.

Conclusions: This BAR design is a powerful approach to use when there are pairings of biomarkers with treatments available for testing simultaneously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean allocation probability for: (A) linked-BAR design and (B) non-linked BAR design as trial progresses for a B1-positive patient when T1 provides benefit in B1-positive patients and T2 is detrimental in B1-positive patients. Lines represent the average over 2500 replicates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean allocation probability for: (A) linked-BAR design and (B) non-linked BAR design as trial progresses for a B1-positive patient when T2 provides benefit in B1-positive patients and T1 is detrimental in B1-positive patients. Lines represent the average over 2500 replicates.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Power of the four designs to recommend T1 in B1-positive patients as prevalence of B1 changes under scenario 2 in Table 1.

References

    1. Adams CP, Brantner VV. Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it really $802 million. Health Aff. 2006;25 (2:420–428. - PubMed
    1. Barker AD, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ, Hylton NM, Berry DA, Esserman LJ. I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86 (1:97–100. - PubMed
    1. Berry SM, Carlin BP, Lee JJ, Muller P. Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials. CRC press; 2010.
    1. Cai J, Xu L, Tang H, Yang Q, Yi X, Fang Y, Zhu Y, Wang Z. The role of the PTEN/PI3K/Akt pathway on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncologist. 2014;19 (5:528–535. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, Haanen JB, Ascierto P, Larkin J, Dummer R, Garbe C, Testori A, Maio M. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364 (26:2507–2516. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources