Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May;30(5):1816-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4452-y. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution

Affiliations

Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution

George Molina et al. Surg Endosc. 2016 May.

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) can usually be managed transanally with full-thickness suture closure by experienced operators. The preliminary safety of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has been demonstrated, but the reported experience with upper rectal tumors is limited. The incidence and management of peritoneal entry during transanal endoscopic surgery across various platforms have not been previously evaluated.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all transanal endoscopic resections performed at a single institution between January 2008 and December 2014 was conducted. Cases with and without peritoneal entry were evaluated with respect to transanal platform used, surgical indication, size, location and distance from the anal verge, and incidence of postoperative complications.

Results: A total of 78 transanal endoscopic procedures were performed on 76 patients using the rigid transanal endoscopic operation (TEO, 65.4 %), TEM (26.9 %), and TAMIS platform (7.7 %). The most common surgical indication included endoscopically unresectable adenomas (50 %). The average distance of lesions from the anal verge (AV) was 9.6 cm (range 4-20 cm). Peritoneal entry occurred in 22 cases (28.2 %). Platform used (TAMIS vs. rigid, p < 0.05), mean distance from the AV (p < 0.0001), location along the rectum (p = 0.01), and mean specimen size (p = 0.01) were associated with a higher likelihood of peritoneal entry. All rectal defects associated with peritoneal entry were successfully closed transanally except for two (TEM and TEO) cases that required conversion to laparoscopic low anterior resection and laparoscopic Hartmann's, respectively. There were four TAMIS cases that required conversion to TEO platforms.

Conclusion: In this high-risk TEM, TEO, and TAMIS series (one-third of rectal lesions located in the upper rectum), 91 % of all peritoneal entries were managed transanally without increased morbidity. TAMIS for upper rectal lesions was associated with a high risk of complicated peritoneal entry requiring conversion to a rigid platform.

Keywords: Adenomas; Peritoneal entry; Rectal cancer; Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM); Transanal endoscopic resection; Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):295-300 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Apr;57(4):438-41 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;29(2):177-81 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2001 Jul;25(7):870-5 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3528-35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources