Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2016 Oct;42(5):635-643.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0554-4. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

Internal versus external fixation of the anterior component in unstable fractures of the pelvic ring: pooled results from a systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Internal versus external fixation of the anterior component in unstable fractures of the pelvic ring: pooled results from a systematic review

B Wardle et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Improving reduction of the pelvic ring improves long-term functional outcomes for patients. It has been demonstrated that posterior internal fixation is necessary to adequately control fractures to the posterior ring and there is evidence that supplementing this with fixation of the anterior ring improves stability. It is accepted that internal fixation provides greater stability than external fixation of the anterior ring but long-term differences in radiographic and functional outcomes have not yet been quantified.

Methods: A search of electronic databases, reference lists and review articles from 1989 to 2015 yielded 18 studies (n = 884) that met our inclusion criteria. We included studies that discussed pelvic ring injuries in adults, reported functional or radiological outcomes or complications by anterior ring intervention and exceeded 14 patients. We excluded biomechanical and cadaver studies.

Results: Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring had better functional and radiographic outcomes. Residual displacement of >10 mm was less common with internal fixation (ER 0.12, 95 % CI 0.06-0.24) than external fixation (ER 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.62). Unsatisfactory outcomes also occurred at a lower rate (ER 0.09, 95 % CI 0.03-0.22) compared to external fixation (ER 0.32, 95 % CI 0.18-0.50). Losses of reduction (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.04 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21), malunions (ER 0.03, 95 % CI 0.01-0.08 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21) and delayed/non-unions (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.05 versus ER 0.04, 95 % CI 0.02-0.07).

Conclusions: Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring as supplementary fixation for unstable injuries to the pelvic ring appears to result in better radiographic and functional outcomes as well as fewer complications. However, data that separated outcomes and complications in relation to interventions of the anterior pelvic ring were limited. More studies looking specifically at outcomes in relation to the type of anterior ring intervention are needed.

Keywords: External fixation; Fracture; Internal fixation; Pelvic Bones; Pelvic ring.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Can J Surg. 1990 Dec;33(6):492-4 - PubMed
    1. Injury. 1992;23 (1):31-7 - PubMed
    1. Ir J Med Sci. 1992 Feb;161(2):39-41 - PubMed
    1. Injury. 2007 Apr;38(4):431-41 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Aug;(329):147-51 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources