Investigation of gender difference in human response to temperature step changes
- PMID: 26265493
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.037
Investigation of gender difference in human response to temperature step changes
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine gender difference in human response to temperature step changes. A total of three step-change conditions (S5: 32 °C-37 °C-32 °C, S11: 26 °C-37 °C-26 °C, and S15: 22 °C-37 °C-22 °C) were designed and a laboratory experiment with 12 males and 12 females was performed. Results of this study support our hypothesis that females differ from males in human response to sudden temperature changes from the perspectives of psychology, physiology and biomarkers. Females are more prone to show thermal dissatisfaction to cool environments while males are more likely to feel thermal discomfort in warm environments. It is logical that men have a stronger thermoregulation ability than women as male skin temperature change amplitude is smaller while the time to be stable for skin temperature is shorter than that of females after both up-steps and down-steps. In S15, males witnessed a more intensive decrease in RMSSD while females underwent a remarkable instant reduce in oral temperatures after the up-step. Marginal significance was observed in male IL-6 before and after the up-step in S15 while female IL-6 prominently increased after the down-step in S15.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Gender difference; Physiological parameters; Subjective perception; Temperature steps.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Sex differences in body temperature and thermal perception under stable and transient thermal environments: A comparative study.Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 15;951:175323. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175323. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Sci Total Environ. 2024. PMID: 39128529
-
Influence of osmotic stress on thermal perception and thermoregulation in heat is different between sedentary and trained men.Physiol Behav. 2016 Jul 1;161:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Physiol Behav. 2016. PMID: 27085909
-
Regional thermal comfort zone in males and females.Physiol Behav. 2016 Jul 1;161:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 13. Physiol Behav. 2016. PMID: 27083125
-
Thermal comfort.Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;156:249-260. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63912-7.00015-1. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018. PMID: 30454593 Review.
-
The effects of manipulating the visual environment on thermal perception: A structured narrative review.J Therm Biol. 2023 Feb;112:103488. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103488. Epub 2023 Jan 25. J Therm Biol. 2023. PMID: 36796929 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of extreme temperature on congenital heart disease mortality: a population-based nationwide case-crossover study.Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Nov 28;53:101244. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101244. eCollection 2024 Dec. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024. PMID: 39686983 Free PMC article.
-
TRPM2 and warmth sensation.Pflugers Arch. 2018 May;470(5):787-798. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2139-7. Epub 2018 Mar 19. Pflugers Arch. 2018. PMID: 29552700 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of time-of-day on human dynamic thermal perception.Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29615-8. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36759630 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of Indoor Temperature Exposure on Emergency Department Visits Due to Infectious and Non-Infectious Respiratory Diseases for Older People.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 15;18(10):5273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105273. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34063510 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic Design for Wearables Devices Addressed from a Gender Perspective: Cross-Influences and a Methodological Proposal.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 10;23(12):5483. doi: 10.3390/s23125483. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37420649 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources