Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of post-treatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma
- PMID: 26272530
- DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.096
Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of post-treatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common brain tumour in adults, which, despite multimodality treatment, has a poor median survival. Efficacy of therapy is assessed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features. There is now a recognised subset of treated patients with imaging features that indicate "progressive disease" according to Macdonald's criteria, but subsequently, show stabilisation or resolution without a change in treatment. In these cases of "pseudoprogression", it is believed that non-tumoural causes lead to increased contrast enhancement and conventional MRI is inadequate in distinguishing this from true tumour progression. Incorrect diagnosis is important, as failure to identify pseudoprogression could lead to an inappropriate change of effective therapy. The purpose of this review is to outline the current research into radiological assessment with MRI and molecular imaging of post-treatment GBMs, specifically the differentiation between pseudoprogression and tumour progression.
Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of post-treatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma.Clin Radiol. 2016 May;71(5):495-6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.014. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Clin Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26896081 No abstract available.
-
Re: Tumour progression or pseudoprogression? A review of posttreatment radiological appearances of glioblastoma. A reply.Clin Radiol. 2016 May;71(5):496-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Clin Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26968231 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
