Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 14:4:12.
doi: 10.1186/s13728-015-0032-y. eCollection 2015.

Reliability of a new test battery for fitness assessment of the European Astronaut corps

Affiliations

Reliability of a new test battery for fitness assessment of the European Astronaut corps

Nora Petersen et al. Extrem Physiol Med. .

Abstract

Background: To optimise health for space missions, European astronauts follow specific conditioning programs before, during and after their flights. To evaluate the effectiveness of these programs, the European Space Agency conducts an Astronaut Fitness Assessment (AFA), but the test-retest reliability of elements within it remains unexamined. The reliability study described here presents a scientific basis for implementing the AFA, but also highlights challenges faced by operational teams supporting humans in such unique environments, especially with respect to health and fitness monitoring of crew members travelling not only into space, but also across the world. The AFA tests assessed parameters known to be affected by prolonged exposure to microgravity: aerobic capacity (VO2max), muscular strength (one repetition max, 1 RM) and power (vertical jumps), core stability, flexibility and balance. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3.1), standard error of measurement and coefficient of variation were used to assess relative and absolute test-retest reliability.

Results: Squat and bench 1 RM (ICC3.1 = 0.94-0.99), hip flexion (ICC3.1 = 0.99) and left and right handgrip strength (ICC3.1 = 0.95 and 0.97), showed the highest test-retest reliability, followed by VO2max (ICC3.1 = 0.91), core strength (ICC3.1 = 0.78-0.89), hip extension (ICC3.1 = 0.63), the countermeasure (ICC3.1 = 0.76) and squat (ICC3.1 = 0.63) jumps, and single right- and left-leg jump height (ICC3.1 = 0.51 and 0.14). For balance, relative reliability ranged from ICC3.1 = 0.78 for path length (two legs, head tilted back, eyes open) to ICC3.1 = 0.04 for average rotation velocity (one leg, eyes closed).

Conclusions: In a small sample (n = 8) of young, healthy individuals, the AFA battery of tests demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability for most parameters except some balance and single-leg jump tasks. These findings suggest that, for the application with astronauts, most AFA tests appear appropriate to be maintained in the test battery, but that some elements may be unreliable, and require either modification (duration, selection of task) or removal (single-leg jump, balance test on sphere) from the battery. The test battery is mobile and universally applicable for occupational and general fitness assessment by its comprehensive composition of tests covering many systems involved in whole body movement.

Keywords: Astronaut fitness assessment; Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC); Reliability; Space flight; Test battery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Instrumented balance board used for balance tasks (L7–10).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Treadmill protocol (modified Bruce protocol) used for the assessment of aerobic capacity [speed (km h−1); stage time (min)].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (+SD) core strength test performance time (s) for the ventral, lateral and dorsal position on the three test days.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean (+SD) measured (via spirometry) and estimated (from blood lactate samples and using the ERGONIZER® software) aerobic capacity on the three test days.

References

    1. Deakin JM, Pelot R, Eng P, Smith JT, Weber CL. Development and validation of canadian forces minimum physical fitness standard (MPFS 2000) Kingston: Ergonomics Research Group Queen’s University; 2000.
    1. Serra C, Rodriguez MC, Delclos GL, Plana M, Gomez Lopez LI, Benavides FG. Criteria and methods used for the assessment of fitness for work: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64(5):304–312. doi: 10.1136/oem.2006.029397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trappe S, Costill D, Gallagher P, Creer A, Peters JR, Evans H, et al. Exercise in space: human skeletal muscle after 6 months aboard the International Space Station. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009;106(4):1159–1168. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91578.2008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gopalakrishnan R, Genc KO, Rice AJ, Lee SM, Evans HJ, Maender CC, et al. Muscle volume, strength, endurance, and exercise loads during 6-month missions in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010;81(2):91–102. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.2583.2010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shackelford LC, LeBlanc AD, Driscoll TB, Evans HJ, Rianon NJ, Smith SM, et al. Resistance exercise as a countermeasure to disuse-induced bone loss. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2004;97(1):119–129. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00741.2003. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources