Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:783296.
doi: 10.1155/2015/783296. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

Healthy Chilean Adolescents with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.6 Have Increased Cardiometabolic Risk: Association with Genetic, Biological, and Environmental Factors

Affiliations

Healthy Chilean Adolescents with HOMA-IR ≥ 2.6 Have Increased Cardiometabolic Risk: Association with Genetic, Biological, and Environmental Factors

R Burrows et al. J Diabetes Res. 2015.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the optimal cutoff of the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) for diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in adolescents and examine whether insulin resistance (IR), determined by this method, was related to genetic, biological, and environmental factors.

Methods: In 667 adolescents (16.8 ± 0.3 y), BMI, waist circumference, glucose, insulin, adiponectin, diet, and physical activity were measured. Fat and fat-free mass were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Family history of type 2 diabetes (FHDM) was reported. We determined the optimal cutoff of HOMA-IR to diagnose MetS (IDF criteria) using ROC analysis. IR was defined as HOMA-IR values above the cutoff. We tested the influence of genetic, biological, and environmental factors on IR using logistic regression analyses.

Results: Of the participants, 16% were obese and 9.4 % met criteria for MetS. The optimal cutoff for MetS diagnosis was a HOMA-IR value of 2.6. Based on this value, 16.3% of participants had IR. Adolescents with IR had a significantly higher prevalence of obesity, abdominal obesity, fasting hyperglycemia, and MetS compared to those who were not IR. FHDM, sarcopenia, obesity, and low adiponectin significantly increased the risk of IR.

Conclusions: In adolescents, HOMA-IR ≥ 2.6 was associated with greater cardiometabolic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve to determine the optimal cutoff value of HOMA-IR for MetS diagnosis in healthy adolescents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence rates of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors by HOMA-IR. Error bars are 95% CI. Statistical significant difference by Pearson's Chi2. Significance level: * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P<0.001.

References

    1. DeFronzo R. A. Insulin resistance, lipotoxicity, type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis: the missing links. The Claude Bernard Lecture 2009. Diabetologia. 2010;53(7):1270–1287. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1684-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ndisang J. F., Rastogi S., Vannacci A. Insulin resistance, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and related complications: current status and future perspective. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2014;2014:p. 2. doi: 10.1155/2014/276475.276475 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiarelli F., Marcovecchio M. L. Insulin resistance and obesity in childhood. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2008;159(1):S67–S74. doi: 10.1530/EJE-08-0245. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy-Marchal C., Arslanian S., Cutfield W., et al. Insulin resistance in children: consensus, perspective, and future directions. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2010;95(12):5189–5198. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shaibi G. Q., Goran M. I. Examining metabolic syndrome definitions in overweight Hispanic youth: a focus on Insulin resistance. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2008;152(2):171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms