Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec 1;43(12):1281-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: A comparison of 2 training programs

Enrique Casalino  1 , Eugenio Astocondor  2 , Juan Carlos Sanchez  3 , David Enrique Díaz-Santana  4 , Carlos Del Aguila  2 , Juan Pablo Carrillo  5
Affiliations

Personal protective equipment for the Ebola virus disease: A comparison of 2 training programs

Enrique Casalino et al. Am J Infect Control. .

Abstract

Background: Personal protective equipment (PPE) for preventing Ebola virus disease (EVD) includes basic PPE (B-PPE) and enhanced PPE (E-PPE). Our aim was to compare conventional training programs (CTPs) and reinforced training programs (RTPs) on the use of B-PPE and E-PPE.

Methods: Four groups were created, designated CTP-B, CTP-E, RTP-B, and RTP-E. All groups received the same theoretical training, followed by 3 practical training sessions.

Results: A total of 120 students were included (30 per group). In all 4 groups, the frequency and number of total errors and critical errors decreased significantly over the course of the training sessions (P < .01). The RTP was associated with a greater reduction in the number of total errors and critical errors (P < .0001). During the third training session, we noted an error frequency of 7%-43%, a critical error frequency of 3%-40%, 0.3-1.5 total errors, and 0.1-0.8 critical errors per student. The B-PPE groups had the fewest errors and critical errors (P < .0001).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that both training methods improved the student's proficiency, that B-PPE appears to be easier to use than E-PPE, that the RTP achieved better proficiency for both PPE types, and that a number of students are still potentially at risk for EVD contamination despite the improvements observed during the training.

Keywords: Courses; Ebola virus disease; Evaluation; Health care workers; Personal protective equipment; Sessions; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer