Chronic Q fever diagnosis— consensus guideline versus expert opinion
- PMID: 26277798
- PMCID: PMC4480373
- DOI: 10.3201/eid2107.130955
Chronic Q fever diagnosis— consensus guideline versus expert opinion
Abstract
Chronic Q fever, caused by Coxiella burnetii, has high mortality and morbidity rates if left untreated. Controversy about the diagnosis of this complex disease has emerged recently. We applied the guideline from the Dutch Q Fever Consensus Group and a set of diagnostic criteria proposed by Didier Raoult to all 284 chronic Q fever patients included in the Dutch National Chronic Q Fever Database during 2006–2012. Of the patients who had proven cases of chronic Q fever by the Dutch guideline, 46 (30.5%)would not have received a diagnosis by the alternative criteria designed by Raoult, and 14 (4.9%) would have been considered to have possible chronic Q fever. Six patients with proven chronic Q fever died of related causes. Until results from future studies are available, by which current guidelines can be modified, we believe that the Dutch literature-based consensus guideline is more sensitive and easier to use in clinical practice.
Comment in
-
No Such Thing as Chronic Q Fever.Emerg Infect Dis. 2017 May;23(5):856-857. doi: 10.3201/eid2305.151159. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017. PMID: 28418317 Free PMC article.
References
-
- van der Hoek W, Dijkstra F, Schimmer B, Schneeberger PM, Vellema P, Wijkmans C, et al. Q fever in the Netherlands: an update on the epidemiology and control measures. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19520. - PubMed
-
- Delsing CE, Kullberg BJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP. Q fever in the Netherlands from 2007 to 2010. Neth J Med. 2010;68:382–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources