Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;41(6):1709-17.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000123. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

Illumination frame of reference in the object-reviewing paradigm: A case of luminance and lightness

Anja Fiedler  1 , Cathleen M Moore  1
Affiliations

Illumination frame of reference in the object-reviewing paradigm: A case of luminance and lightness

Anja Fiedler et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

The present study combines the object-reviewing paradigm (Kahneman, Treisman, & Gibbs, 1992) with the checkershadow illusion (Adelson, 1995) to contrast the effects of objects' luminance versus lightness on the object-specific preview benefit. To this end, we manipulated objects' luminance and the amount of illumination given by an informative background scene in experiments. In line with previous studies (Moore, Stephens, & Hein, 2010), there was no object-specific preview benefit when objects were presented on a uniformly colored background and luminance switched between objects. In contrast, when objects were presented on the checkershadow illusion background which provided an explanation for the luminance switch, a reliable object-specific preview benefit was observed. This suggests that object correspondence as measured by the object-reviewing paradigm can be influenced by scene-induced, perceived lightness of objects' surfaces. We replicated this finding and moreover showed that the scene context only influences the object-specific preview benefit if the objects are perceived as part of the background scene.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The checkershadow illusion first published by Adelson in 1995. Left: The checks A and B are equiluminant but their perceived lightness differs. Right: Superimposition of two bars in the same shade of gray destroys the illusion. ©1995, E.H. Adelson
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean reaction time (RT in ms) error rates (Error in %) as a function of Congruency (same object vs. different objects) and Background (plain gray vs. checkerboard) in Experiment 1. Error bars show the mean ± standard error using the algorithm for within-subject designs recommended by Cousineau (2005).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean reaction time (RT in ms) error rates (Error in %) as a function of Congruency and Luminance in Experiment 2. Error bars show the mean ± standard error using the algorithm for within-subject designs recommended by Cousineau (2005).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean reaction time (RT in ms) error rates (Error in %) as a function of Congruency (same object vs. different objects) and Luminance (no switch vs. switch) in Experiment 3. Error bars show the mean ± standard error using the algorithm for within-subject designs recommended by Cousineau (2005).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean reaction time (RT in ms) and error rates (Error in %) as a function of Congruency (same object vs. different objects) and Luminance (no switch vs. switch) in Experiment 4. Error bars show the mean ± standard error using the algorithm for within-subject designs recommended by Cousineau (2005).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adelson EH. Checkershadow illusion. 1995 ( http://persci.mit.edu/gallery/checkershadow)
    1. Boyaci H, Fang F, Murray SO, Kersten D. Perceptual grouping-dependent lightness processing in human early visual cortex. Journal of Vision. 2010;10:1–12. doi: http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/4. - PubMed
    1. Brainard DH. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial vision. 1997;10:433–436. - PubMed
    1. Burt P, Sperling G. Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological review. 1981;88:171. - PubMed
    1. Cousineau D. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2005;1:42–45.

Publication types