Validation of a contemporary adherence measure for children with Type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Management Questionnaire
- PMID: 26280463
- PMCID: PMC4802856
- DOI: 10.1111/dme.12682
Validation of a contemporary adherence measure for children with Type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Management Questionnaire
Abstract
Aims: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Diabetes Management Questionnaire, a brief, self-report measure of adherence to contemporary diabetes management for young people with Type 1 diabetes and their caregivers.
Methods: A total of 273 parent-child dyads completed parallel versions of the Diabetes Management Questionnaire. Eligible children (aged 8-18 years) had Type 1 diabetes for ≥1 year. A multidisciplinary team designed the Diabetes Management Questionnaire as a brief, self-administered measure of adherence to Type 1 diabetes management over the preceding month; higher scores reflect greater adherence. Psychometrics were evaluated for the entire sample and according to age of the child.
Results: The children (49% female) had a mean ± sd (range) age 13.3 ± 2.9 (8-18) years and their mean ± sd HbA1c was 71 ± 15 mmol/mol (8.6 ± 1.4%). Internal consistency was good for parents (α = 0.83) and children (α = 0.79). Test-retest reliability was excellent for parents (intraclass correlation coefficient =0.83) and good for children (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.65). Parent and child scores had moderate agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.54). Diabetes Management Questionnaire scores were inversely associated with HbA1c (parents: r = -0.41, P < 0.0001; children: r = -0.27, P < 0.0001). Psychometrics were stronger in the children aged ≥13 years compared with those aged < 13 years, but were acceptable in both age groups. Mean ± sd Diabetes Management Questionnaire scores were higher among children who were receiving insulin pump therapy (n = 181) than in children receiving multiple daily injections (n = 92) according to parent (75.9 ± 11.8 vs. 70.5 ± 15.5; P = 0.004) and child report (72.2 ± 12.1 vs. 67.6 ± 13.9; P = 0.006).
Conclusions: The Diabetes Management Questionnaire is a brief, valid self-report measure of adherence to contemporary diabetes self-management for people aged 8-18 years who are receiving either multiple daily injections or insulin pump therapy.
© 2015 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2015 Diabetes UK.
Similar articles
-
Re-examining a measure of diabetes-related burden in parents of young people with Type 1 diabetes: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Survey - Parent Revised version (PAID-PR).Diabet Med. 2012 Apr;29(4):526-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03434.x. Diabet Med. 2012. PMID: 21883443 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of the Pediatric Diabetes Routines Questionnaire for Adolescents.J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019 Mar;26(1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s10880-018-9563-x. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019. PMID: 29626282
-
Future acceptance of automated insulin delivery systems in youths with type 1 diabetes: validation of the Italian artificial pancreas-acceptance measure.Acta Diabetol. 2025 Feb;62(2):177-183. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02327-9. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Acta Diabetol. 2025. PMID: 39126517 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Evaluation of a Turkish Version of the Diabetes Fear of Self-injecting and Self-testing Questionnaire (D-FISQ).Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016 Sep;10(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 22. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2016. PMID: 27692248
-
Validation of an abbreviated adherence measure for young people with Type 1 diabetes.Diabet Med. 2011 Sep;28(9):1113-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03321.x. Diabet Med. 2011. PMID: 21843307 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016 Jul 29;8:54. doi: 10.1186/s13098-016-0162-4. eCollection 2016. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2016. PMID: 27478510 Free PMC article.
-
Youth and parent measures of self-efficacy for continuous glucose monitoring: survey psychometric properties.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 May;17(5):327-34. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0366. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015. PMID: 25695341 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Associations of diabetes self-management characteristics, HbA1c, and psychosocial outcomes with depressive symptoms in a contemporary sample of adolescents with type 1 diabetes.J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Mar;35(3):107838. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107838. Epub 2021 Jan 6. J Diabetes Complications. 2021. PMID: 33431226 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Transition Readiness in Older Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.Clin Diabetes. 2024 Winter;42(1):135-141. doi: 10.2337/cd23-0014. Epub 2023 Sep 25. Clin Diabetes. 2024. PMID: 38230326
-
Observed Characteristics Associated with Diabetes Device Use Among Teens with Type 1 Diabetes.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):186-194. doi: 10.1177/19322968211050069. Epub 2021 Oct 15. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 34652236 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Beck RW, Tamborlane WV, Bergenstal RM, Miller KM, Dubose SN, Hall CA. The T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:4383–4389. - PubMed
-
- Danne T, Mortensen HB, Hougaard P, Lynggaard H, Aanstoot HJ, Chiarelli F, et al. Persistent differences among centers over 3 years in glycemic control and hypoglycemia in a study of 3,805 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the Hvidore Study Group. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1342–1347. - PubMed
-
- Butler DA, Zuehlke JB, Tovar A, Volkening LK, Anderson BJ, Laffel LM. The impact of modifiable family factors on glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2008;9:373–381. - PubMed
-
- Hood KK, Peterson CM, Rohan JM, Drotar D. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2009;124:e1171–1179. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical