Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct:142:19-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety

Graham P Martin  1 , Lorna McKee  2 , Mary Dixon-Woods  3
Affiliations

Beyond metrics? Utilizing 'soft intelligence' for healthcare quality and safety

Graham P Martin et al. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Formal metrics for monitoring the quality and safety of healthcare have a valuable role, but may not, by themselves, yield full insight into the range of fallibilities in organizations. 'Soft intelligence' is usefully understood as the processes and behaviours associated with seeking and interpreting soft data-of the kind that evade easy capture, straightforward classification and simple quantification-to produce forms of knowledge that can provide the basis for intervention. With the aim of examining current and potential practice in relation to soft intelligence, we conducted and analysed 107 in-depth qualitative interviews with senior leaders, including managers and clinicians, involved in healthcare quality and safety in the English National Health Service. We found that participants were in little doubt about the value of softer forms of data, especially for their role in revealing troubling issues that might be obscured by conventional metrics. Their struggles lay in how to access softer data and turn them into a useful form of knowing. Some of the dominant approaches they used risked replicating the limitations of hard, quantitative data. They relied on processes of aggregation and triangulation that prioritised reliability, or on instrumental use of soft data to animate the metrics. The unpredictable, untameable, spontaneous quality of soft data could be lost in efforts to systematize their collection and interpretation to render them more tractable. A more challenging but potentially rewarding approach involved processes and behaviours aimed at disrupting taken-for-granted assumptions about quality, safety, and organizational performance. This approach, which explicitly values the seeking out and the hearing of multiple voices, is consistent with conceptual frameworks of organizational sensemaking and dialogical understandings of knowledge. Using soft intelligence this way can be challenging and discomfiting, but may offer a critical defence against the complacency that can precede crisis.

Keywords: England; Healthcare quality metrics; Knowledge management; Patient safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alvesson M., Spicer A. A stupidity-based theory of organizations. J. Manag. Stud. 2012;49(7):1194–1220.
    1. Armstrong N., Herbert G., Aveling E.-L., Dixon-Woods M., Martin G. Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement. Health Expect. 2013;16(3):36–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloor M. A minor office: the variable and socially constructed character of death certification in a Scottish city. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1991;32(3):273–287. - PubMed
    1. Charmaz K. Sage; London: 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory.
    1. Currie G., Waring J., Finn R. The limits of knowledge management for UK public services modernization: the case of patient safety and service quality. Public Adm. 2008;86(2):363–385.

Publication types