Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 18;314(7):708-17.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7885.

Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Affiliations
Review

Septic Shock: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Christopher W Seymour et al. JAMA. .

Erratum in

  • Incorrect Title for Table.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1404. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11164. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26441192 No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Septic shock is a clinical emergency that occurs in more than 230,000 US patients each year. OBSERVATIONS AND ADVANCES: In the setting of suspected or documented infection, septic shock is typically defined in a clinical setting by low systolic (≤90 mm Hg) or mean arterial blood pressure (≤65 mm Hg) accompanied by signs of hypoperfusion (eg, oliguria, hyperlactemia, poor peripheral perfusion, or altered mental status). Focused ultrasonography is recommended for the prompt recognition of complicating physiology (eg, hypovolemia or cardiogenic shock), while invasive hemodynamic monitoring is recommended only for select patients. In septic shock, 3 randomized clinical trials demonstrate that protocolized care offers little advantage compared with management without a protocol. Hydroxyethyl starch is no longer recommended, and debate continues about the role of various crystalloid solutions and albumin.

Conclusions and relevance: The prompt diagnosis of septic shock begins with obtainment of medical history and performance of a physical examination for signs and symptoms of infection and may require focused ultrasonography to recognize more complex physiologic manifestations of shock. Clinicians should understand the importance of prompt administration of intravenous fluids and vasoactive medications aimed at restoring adequate circulation, and the limitations of protocol-based therapy, as guided by recent evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Both authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr Seymour reports receipt of consultancy fees from Beckman Coulter outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Proposed Algorithm for Treatment of Septic Shock ECG indicates electrocardiogram; ECHO, echocardiogram; IVF, intravenous fluids; LV/RV, left ventricular/right ventricular; MAP, mean arterial pressure; PCA pulse contour analysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; ScvO2, continuous central venous oxygen saturation. aTissue hypoperfusion typically manifests as altered mentation, low urinary output, poor peripheral perfusion, and/or hyperlactemia (≥2.0 mmol/L). bNorepinephrine may not always be the first choice in setting of tachycarrythmias or atrial fibrillation; consider adding vasopressin for norepinephrine rates that exceed 15 3g/kg/min. cThe choice for fluid repletion and type will be refined by ongoing safety checks for pulmonary edema/fluid overload, metabolic derangements from unbalanced crystalloids, and ongoing losses.

Comment in

References

    1. Walley KR, Wood LDH. Shock. In: Hall J, Wood LDH, editors. Principles of Critical Care. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Co; 1998. pp. 277–301.
    1. Millham FH. A brief history of shock. Surgery. 2010;148(5):1026–1037. - PubMed
    1. Manji RA, Wood KE, Kumar A. The history and evolution of circulatory shock. Crit Care Clin. 2009;25(1):1–29. - PubMed
    1. Weil MH, Shubin H. Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1971;23(0):13–23. - PubMed
    1. Parker MM, Shelhamer JH, Bacharach SL, et al. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100(4):483–490. - PubMed

Publication types