Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;33(6):930-40.
doi: 10.1002/humu.22049.

Diagnostic interpretation of array data using public databases and internet sources

Affiliations

Diagnostic interpretation of array data using public databases and internet sources

Nicole de Leeuw et al. Hum Mutat. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

The range of commercially available array platforms and analysis software packages is expanding and their utility is improving, making reliable detection of copy-number variants (CNVs) relatively straightforward. Reliable interpretation of CNV data, however, is often difficult and requires expertise. With our knowledge of the human genome growing rapidly, applications for array testing continuously broadening, and the resolution of CNV detection increasing, this leads to great complexity in interpreting what can be daunting data. Correct CNV interpretation and optimal use of the genotype information provided by single-nucleotide polymorphism probes on an array depends largely on knowledge present in various resources. In addition to the availability of host laboratories' own datasets and national registries, there are several public databases and Internet resources with genotype and phenotype information that can be used for array data interpretation. With so many resources now available, it is important to know which are fit-for-purpose in a diagnostic setting. We summarize the characteristics of the most commonly used Internet databases and resources, and propose a general data interpretation strategy that can be used for comparative hybridization, comparative intensity, and genotype-based array data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of a general workflow to determine the relevance of an event detected by genome-wide array analysis to the observed phenotype of a patient.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph showing the number of laboratories (Y-axis) using the various resources (X-axis) to interpret their array results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of chromosome 9 showing a terminal loss of the short arm detected by genome-wide SNP array analysis. The deleted region is shown in the UCSC Genome Browser and several tracks are selected to help in interpreting this loss and to determine its clinical relevance. From top to bottom, the following tracks were selected: chromosome bands, DECIPHER, OMIM genes, RefSeq genes, Microarray Probe sets, SNP Genotyping Arrays, DGV, and duplications.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic representation of possible connections between databases and Internet resources that can be used to optimize the quality and speed of array data interpretation. See text for details on the various resources.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alkan C, Kidd JM, Marques-Bonet T, Aksay G, Antonacci F, Hormozdiari F, Kitzman JO, Baker C, Malig M, Mutlu O, Sahinalp SC, Gibbs RA, Eichler EE. Personalized copy number and segmental duplication maps using next-generation sequencing. Nat Genet. 2009;41:1061–1067. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Church DM, Lappalainen I, Sneddon TP, Hinton J, Maguire M, Lopez J, Garner J, Paschall J, DiCuccio M, Yaschenko E, Scherer SW, Feuk L, Flicek P. Public data archives for genomic structural variation. Nat Genet. 2010;42:813–814. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, Feuk L, Gokcumen O, Zhang Y, Aerts J, Andrews TD, Barnes C, Campbell P, Fitzgerald T, Hu M, Ihm CH, Kristiansson K, Macarthur DG, Macdonald JR, Onyiah I, Pang AW, Robson S, Stirrups K, Valsesia A, Walter K, Wei J, Tyler-Smith C, Carter NP, Lee C, Scherer SW, Hurles ME Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature. 2010;464:704–412. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demars J, Rossignol S, Netchine I, Lee KS, Shmela M, Faivre L, Weill J, Odent S, Azzi S, Callier P, Lucas J, Dubourg C, Andrieux J, Bouc YL, El-Osta A, Gicquel C. New insights into the pathogenesis of Beckwith-Wiedemann and Silver-Russell syndromes: contribution of small copy number variations to 11p15 imprinting defects. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:1171–1182. - PubMed
    1. Feenstra I, Fang J, Koolen DA, Siezen A, Evans C, Winter RM, Lees MM, Riegel M, de Vries BBA, van Ravenswaaij CMA, Schinzel A. European cytogenetics association register of unbalanced chromosome aberrations (ECARUCA): an online database for rare chromosomal abnormalities. Eur J Med Genet. 2006;49:279–291. - PubMed

Publication types