Mutations of Epigenetic Modifier Genes as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Under Treatment With All-Trans Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide
- PMID: 26285909
- PMCID: PMC4535155
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.006
Mutations of Epigenetic Modifier Genes as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Under Treatment With All-Trans Retinoic Acid and Arsenic Trioxide
Abstract
Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a model for synergistic target cancer therapy using all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO), which yields a very high 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 85 to 90%. Nevertheless, about 15% of APL patients still get early death or relapse. We performed this study to address the possible impact of additional gene mutations on the outcome of APL.
Methods: We included a consecutive series of 266 cases as training group, and then validated the results in a testing group of 269 patients to investigate the potential prognostic gene mutations, including FLT3-ITD or -TKD, N-RAS, C-KIT, NPM1, CEPBA, WT1, ASXL1, DNMT3A, MLL (fusions and PTD), IDH1, IDH2 and TET2.
Results: More high-risk patients (50.4%) carried additional mutations, as compared with intermediate- and low-risk ones. The mutations of epigenetic modifier genes were associated with poor prognosis in terms of disease-free survival in both training (HR = 6.761, 95% CI 2.179-20.984; P = 0.001) and validation (HR = 4.026, 95% CI 1.089-14.878; P = 0.037) groups. Sanz risk stratification was associated with CR induction and OS.
Conclusion: In an era of ATRA/ATO treatment, both molecular markers and clinical parameter based stratification systems should be used as prognostic factors for APL.
Keywords: Acute promyelocytic leukemia; Epigenetic; Mutation; Prognosis.
Figures
Comment in
-
Epigenetic Gene Mutations Impact on Outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.EBioMedicine. 2015 May 22;2(6):487-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.04.020. eCollection 2015 Jun. EBioMedicine. 2015. PMID: 26288810 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Au W.Y., Lam C.C., Ma E.S., Man C., Wan T., Kwong Y.L. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome after eradication of acute promyelocytic leukemia: cytogenetic and molecular features. Hum. Pathol. 2001;32(1):126–129. - PubMed
-
- Avvisati G., Lo Coco F., Diverio D. AIDA (all-trans retinoic acid + idarubicin) in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia: a Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) pilot study. Blood. 1996;88(4):1390–1398. - PubMed
-
- Bashey A., Gill R., Levi S. Mutational activation of the N-ras oncogene assessed in primary clonogenic culture of acute myeloid leukemia (AML): implications for the role of N-ras mutation in AML pathogenesis. Blood. 1992;79(4):981–989. - PubMed
-
- Beitinjaneh A., Jang S., Roukoz H., Majhail N.S. Prognostic significance of FLT3 internal tandem duplication and tyrosine kinase domain mutations in acute promyelocytic leukemia: a systematic review. Leuk. Res. 2010;34(7):831–836. - PubMed
-
- Bowen D.T., Frew M.E., Hills R. RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years. Blood. 2005;106(6):2113–2119. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
