Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;20(1):119-29.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1413-2. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

A validated, risk assessment tool for predicting readmission after open ventral hernia repair

Affiliations

A validated, risk assessment tool for predicting readmission after open ventral hernia repair

P A Baltodano et al. Hernia. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background/purpose: To present a validated model that reliably predicts unplanned readmission after open ventral hernia repair (open-VHR).

Study design: A total of 17,789 open-VHR patients were identified using the 2011-2012 ACS-NSQIP databases. This cohort was subdivided into 70 and 30% random testing and validation samples, respectively. Thirty-day unplanned readmission was defined as unexpected readmission for a postoperative occurrence related to the open-VHR procedure. Independent predictors of 30-day unplanned readmission were identified using multivariable logistic regression on the testing sample (n = 12,452 patients). Subsequently, the predictors were weighted according to β-coefficients to generate an integer-based Clinical Risk Score (CRS) predictive of readmission, which was validated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of the validation sample (n = 5337 patients).

Results: The rate of 30-day unplanned readmission was 4.7%. Independent risk factors included inpatient status at time of open-VHR, operation time, enterolysis, underweight, diabetes, preoperative anemia, length of stay, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of bleeding disorders, hernia with gangrene, and panniculectomy (all P < 0.05). ROC analysis of the validation cohort rendered an area under the curve of 0.71, which demonstrates the accuracy of this prediction model. Predicted incidence within each 5 risk strata was statistically similar to the observed incidence in the validation sample (P = 0.18), further highlighting the accuracy of this model.

Conclusion: We present a validated risk stratification tool for unplanned readmissions following open-VHR. Future studies should determine if implementation of our CRS optimizes safety and reduces readmission rates in open-VHR patients.

Keywords: Hospital readmission; Incisional hernia; Prediction model; Prediction tool; Risk assessment; Ventral hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov;215(5):607-15 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):928-35 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1446-51 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2008 Oct;18(10):1233-40 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 2013 Dec;206(6):942-8; discussion 948-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources