Early results from a multi-component French public-private partnership initiative to improve participation in clinical research - CeNGEPS: a prospective before-after study
- PMID: 26286263
- PMCID: PMC4541748
- DOI: 10.1186/s12874-015-0044-8
Early results from a multi-component French public-private partnership initiative to improve participation in clinical research - CeNGEPS: a prospective before-after study
Abstract
Background: A public-private (51/49 %) partnership was initiated in 2007 in France to improve the attractiveness of French sites in industry-sponsored international clinical trials. This initiative developed and implemented a combination of structuring actions and support actions. Here we report the assessment of the impact after 6 years on participation of French study sites in industry-sponsored clinical trials.
Methods: We performed a prospective before-after study of clinical research activities in French public hospitals to assess the impact of actions developed and implemented by CeNGEPS. The programme involved a combination of structuring actions (establishment of sites of excellence, national networks and dedicated clinical research assistants (CRAs)), support actions (tools, templates and training) and competitive budget allocation for sites or networks based on performance. The impact was assessed using the following performance criteria: 1) reduction of the delay to contract signature to ≤ 60 days for 80 % of the trial sites; 2) inclusion of ≥80 % of the planned number of patients by at least 80 % of trial sites; 3) closure of <15 % of trials sites without patients enrolled.
Results: In 2013, the median delay to contract signature was: 55 days, compared with 76 days in 2008 (27.6 % reduction), 50.5 % of all sites and 58 % of sites with a dedicated CRA included ≥80 % of the planned number of patients compared with 44.8 % in 2008 (12.7 % increase) and 21.3 % of all sites and 9 % of sites with a dedicated CRA closed with no patients included, compared with 26.4 % in 2008 (19.3 and 65.9 %, respectively).
Conclusions: These results provide evidence that it is possible to improve a country's attractiveness for industry-sponsored clinical research. The two main actions, i.e. establishing sites of excellence throughout the country with well-trained, dedicated staff and establishing a national network of clinical investigators, could be adapted to other countries in Western Europe to improve Europe's attractiveness to industry-funded trials.
Similar articles
-
[Organisation of clinical research in France: the new missions of inter-regional delegations for clinical research].Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008 May;192(5):929-37; discussion 937-9. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2008. PMID: 19238783 French.
-
[Clinical research activity of the French cancer cooperative network: Overview and perspectives].Bull Cancer. 2017 Jul-Aug;104(7-8):652-661. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Bull Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28688747 French.
-
Public-private partnership models in France and in Europe.Therapie. 2006 Jul-Aug;61(4):325-34, 313-23. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2006059. Therapie. 2006. PMID: 17124948 Review. English, French.
-
[France, an attractive country for international clinical research: 2010 survey assessed by Leem (French association of pharmaceutical companies)].Therapie. 2011 Jan-Feb;66(1):1-15. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2011007. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Therapie. 2011. PMID: 21466772 French.
-
Cooperative Group Trials in the Community Setting.Semin Oncol. 2015 Oct;42(5):686-92. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2015.07.011. Epub 2015 Jul 10. Semin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26433550 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Marmot J. The attractiveness of France for the healthcare industry [L'attractivité de la France pour les industries des biens de santé]. Ministère de l'industrie; 2004 [Last accessed 7 April 2015]. Available from: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/044000208/index.....
-
- Masson A. Following the example of other country's public policies to improve the attractiveness for the innovative pharmaceutical industry [S'inspirer des politiques publiques étrangères d'attractivité pour l'industrie pharmaceutique innovante]. Conseil général des mines; 2004 [Last accessed 7 April 2015]. Available from: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/044000206/index.....
-
- LEEM. The attractiveness of France for International clinical research. 2006 [Last accessed 7 April 2015]. Available from: http://www.ariis.fr/2007/05/29/attractivite-de-la-france-pour-la-recherc....
-
- Zannad F, Pletan Y. Difficulties with conducting clinical trials in France. Therapie. 2001;56(4):341–347. - PubMed
-
- European Parliament and Council. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 4 Apr 2001 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. In. Edited by Community OJE, vol. L121:34–44; 2001. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical