Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression
- PMID: 26286985
- PMCID: PMC4547249
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1500012112
Why chloroplasts and mitochondria retain their own genomes and genetic systems: Colocation for redox regulation of gene expression
Abstract
Chloroplasts and mitochondria are subcellular bioenergetic organelles with their own genomes and genetic systems. DNA replication and transmission to daughter organelles produces cytoplasmic inheritance of characters associated with primary events in photosynthesis and respiration. The prokaryotic ancestors of chloroplasts and mitochondria were endosymbionts whose genes became copied to the genomes of their cellular hosts. These copies gave rise to nuclear chromosomal genes that encode cytosolic proteins and precursor proteins that are synthesized in the cytosol for import into the organelle into which the endosymbiont evolved. What accounts for the retention of genes for the complete synthesis within chloroplasts and mitochondria of a tiny minority of their protein subunits? One hypothesis is that expression of genes for protein subunits of energy-transducing enzymes must respond to physical environmental change by means of a direct and unconditional regulatory control--control exerted by change in the redox state of the corresponding gene product. This hypothesis proposes that, to preserve function, an entire redox regulatory system has to be retained within its original membrane-bound compartment. Colocation of gene and gene product for redox regulation of gene expression (CoRR) is a hypothesis in agreement with the results of a variety of experiments designed to test it and which seem to have no other satisfactory explanation. Here, I review evidence relating to CoRR and discuss its development, conclusions, and implications. This overview also identifies predictions concerning the results of experiments that may yet prove the hypothesis to be incorrect.
Keywords: CoRR hypothesis; chloroplast; mitochondrion; oxidative phosphorylation; photosynthesis.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The function of genomes in bioenergetic organelles.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 29;358(1429):19-37; discussion 37-8. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1191. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003. PMID: 12594916 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The CoRR hypothesis for genes in organelles.J Theor Biol. 2017 Dec 7;434:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 11. J Theor Biol. 2017. PMID: 28408315
-
Redox regulation and modification of proteins controlling chloroplast gene expression.Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005 May-Jun;7(5-6):607-18. doi: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.607. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005. PMID: 15890004 Review.
-
Redox signalling in chloroplasts and mitochondria: genomic and biochemical evidence for two-component regulatory systems in bioenergetic organelles.Biochem Soc Trans. 2001 Aug;29(Pt 4):403-7. doi: 10.1042/bst0290403. Biochem Soc Trans. 2001. PMID: 11497997 Review.
-
Balancing the two photosystems: photosynthetic electron transfer governs transcription of reaction centre genes in chloroplasts.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 29;355(1402):1351-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0697. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000. PMID: 11127990 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Complete Chloroplast Genome Characterization of Oxalis Corniculata and Its Comparison with Related Species from Family Oxalidaceae.Plants (Basel). 2020 Jul 23;9(8):928. doi: 10.3390/plants9080928. Plants (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32717796 Free PMC article.
-
Structure and features of the complete chloroplast genome of Melastoma dodecandrum.Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019 Jul;25(4):1043-1054. doi: 10.1007/s12298-019-00651-x. Epub 2019 Mar 12. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2019. PMID: 31404219 Free PMC article.
-
Complete mitochondrial genomes of three Mangifera species, their genomic structure and gene transfer from chloroplast genomes.BMC Genomics. 2022 Feb 19;23(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08383-1. BMC Genomics. 2022. PMID: 35183120 Free PMC article.
-
Mitonuclear epistasis, genotype-by-environment interactions, and personalized genomics of complex traits in Drosophila.IUBMB Life. 2018 Dec;70(12):1275-1288. doi: 10.1002/iub.1954. Epub 2018 Nov 5. IUBMB Life. 2018. PMID: 30394643 Free PMC article.
-
Rampant nuclear-mitochondrial-plastid phylogenomic discordance in globally distributed calcifying microalgae.New Phytol. 2022 Aug;235(4):1394-1408. doi: 10.1111/nph.18219. Epub 2022 Jun 15. New Phytol. 2022. PMID: 35556250 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen JF. Control of gene expression by redox potential and the requirement for chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes. J Theor Biol. 1993;165(4):609–631. - PubMed
-
- Allen JF. Redox control of gene expression and the function of chloroplast genomes: An hypothesis. Photosynth Res. 1993;36(2):95–102. - PubMed
-
- Allen JF, Raven JA. Free-radical-induced mutation vs redox regulation: Costs and benefits of genes in organelles. J Mol Evol. 1996;42(5):482–492. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources