Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 21:13:274.
doi: 10.1186/s12967-015-0638-2.

Foxp3-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes liver allograft tolerance through the generation of regulatory T cells in rats

Affiliations

Foxp3-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes liver allograft tolerance through the generation of regulatory T cells in rats

Haizhi Qi et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: The transcription factor forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) is a master regulatory gene necessary for the development and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have recently emerged as promising candidates for cell-based immunosuppression/tolerance induction protocols. Thus, we hypothesized that MSC-based Foxp3 gene therapy would improve immunosuppressive capacity of MSC and induce donor-specific allograft tolerance in rat's liver allograft model.

Methods: The present study utilized a lentivirus vector to overexpress the therapeutic gene Foxp3 on MSC. In vivo, Injections of 2 × 10(6) MSC, FUGW-MSC or Foxp3-MSC into the portal vein were carried out immediately after liver transplantation.

Results: Successful gene transfer of Foxp3 in MSC was achieved by lentivirus carrying Foxp3 and Foxp3-MSC engraftment in liver allograft was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy. Foxp3-MSC treatment significantly inhibited the proliferation of allogeneic ACI CD4(+) T cells to splenocytes (SC) from the same donor strain or third-party BN rat compared with MSC. Foxp3-MSC suppressive effect on the proliferation of CD4(+) T cells is contact dependent and associated with Programmed death ligand 1(PD-L1) upregulation in MSC. Co-culture of CD4(+) T cells with Foxp3-MSC results in a shift towards a Tregs phenotype. More importantly, Foxp3-MSC monotherapy achieved donor-specific liver allograft tolerance and generated a state of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs-dependent tolerance.

Conclusion: Foxp3-engineered MSC therapy seems to be a promising and attractive cell therapy approach for inducing immunosuppression or transplant tolerance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Successful gene transfer of Foxp3 in MSC and Foxp3-MSC engraftment in liver allograft. a MSC were infected with control lentivirus (FUGW, Green) and GFP-Foxp3 lentivirus (Foxp3, Green), Nucleus were stained by DAPI (Blue). MSC were efficiently transduced with >95 % GFP-positive cells. b The expression of Foxp3 was detected by western blot in Foxp3-MSC and FUGW-MSC lysis at 96 h after infection. The production of Foxp3-GFP fusion protein was confirmed in Foxp3-MSC lysis compared with FUGW-MSC lysis. c Liver allograft sections were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy for the presence of GFP-Foxp3-MSC, substantial numbers of GFP-Foxp3-MSC liver graft were observed in liver allograft (upper panel, original magnification ×400; lower panel, original magnification ×100)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Foxp3 transduction improved the immunosuppressive activity of MSC and induced the expansion of Foxp3+ Tregs. a The immunogenicity of Foxp3-MSC and effect of Foxp3-MSC on T cell proliferative response in vitro. Results are mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs PBS; # p < 0.05 vs MSC; & p < 0.05 vs Foxp3-MSC. b Foxp3 transduction significantly improved the immunosuppressive activity of MSC. Results are mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs MSC. c The expression of cell surface molecule in MSCs altered by Foxp3 transduction. Isotype FUGW-MSC are represented by open histograms and Foxp3-MSC by closed histograms. d, e Blocking experiments with neutralizing mAb of Nrp-1 and PD-L1 on CD4+ T cell proliferative response. Results are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs PBS; # p < 0.05 vs Foxp3-MSC + IgG. f Frequency of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells. Results are representative of five independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs PBS; # p < 0.05 vs MSC. g Representative dot plots of CD25 and Foxp3 staining of CD4+-gated cells. Percentages of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells are indicated in the top right corners of each dot plot
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Foxp3-MSC monotherapy achieves donor-specific liver allograft tolerance. a Kaplan–Meier survival curves for untreated, donor-derived MSC, FUGW-MSC and Foxp3-MSC, recipient-derived Foxp3-MSC and third party Foxp3-MSC groups. b Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the Foxp3-MSC, Foxp3-MSC+IgG and Foxp3-MSC+α-CD25 groups. c Histology of liver allografts in ACI recipients on POD 7 (H&E, original magnification ×100). d RAI scores according to the Banff scheme. Results are mean ± SE of five independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs untreated; # p < 0.05 vs MSC. e, f Changes in the serum ALT, AST and TBIL concentrations in all 4 groups 7 days after LT. Results are mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs untreated; # p < 0.05 vs MSC. g Representative skin biopsy samples were obtained on day 7 and 100 after skin transplantation (H&E, original magnification ×100)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Frequency of Tregs generated in ACI recipients. a Representative dot plots of splenic Tregs. Percentages of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells are indicated in the top right corners of each dot plot. b Graphic results of frequency of splenic CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells. Results are representative of five independent experiments. *p < 0.05 vs untreated; # p < 0.05 vs MSC. c Graphical representation of numbers of Foxp3+ T cells (cells/mm2) within the liver allografts. The results are representative of six separate experiments. *p < 0.05 vs untreated; # p < 0.05 vs MSC. d Representative immunohistochemistry staining of intragraft Foxp3+ T cells. (IHC, original magnification ×100)

References

    1. Long E, Wood KJ. Understanding FOXP3: progress towards achieving transplantation tolerance. Transplantation. 2007;84(4):459–461. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000275424.52998.ad. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lai Y, Drobinskaya I, Kolossov E, Chen C, Linn T. Genetic modification of cells for transplantation. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(2):146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park TG, Jeong JH, Kim SW. Current status of polymeric gene delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(4):467–486. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.03.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dalberto TP, Nardi NB, Camassola M. Mesenchymal stem cells as a platform for gene therapy protocols. Sci Prog. 2010;93(Pt 2):129–140. doi: 10.3184/003685010X12708191209250. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uccelli A, Moretta L, Pistoia V. Immunoregulatory function of mesenchymal stem cells. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36(10):2566–2573. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636416. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances