Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 21;3(1):29.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0086-z.

An empowerment intervention for Indigenous communities: an outcome assessment

Irina Kinchin  1   2 , Susan Jacups  3 , Komla Tsey  4 , Katrina Lines  5
Affiliations

An empowerment intervention for Indigenous communities: an outcome assessment

Irina Kinchin et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: Empowerment programs have been shown to contribute to increased empowerment of individuals and build capacity within the community or workplace. To-date, the impact of empowerment programs has yet to be quantified in the published literature in this field. This study assessed the Indigenous-developed Family Wellbeing (FWB) program as an empowerment intervention for a child safety workforce in remote Indigenous communities by measuring effect sizes. The study also assessed the value of measurement tools for future impact evaluations.

Methods: A three-day FWB workshop designed to promote empowerment and workplace engagement among child protection staff was held across five remote north Queensland Indigenous communities. The FWB assessment tool comprised a set of validated surveys including the Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM), Australian Unity Wellbeing Index, Kessler psychological distress scale (K10) and Workforce engagement survey. The assessment was conducted pre-intervention and three months post-intervention.

Results: The analysis of pre-and post-surveys revealed that the GEM appeared to be the most tangible measure for detecting positive changes in communication, conflict resolution, decision making and life skill development. The GEM indicated a 17 % positive change compared to 9 % for the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index, 5 % for the workforce engagement survey and less than 1 % for K10.

Conclusions: This study extended qualitative research and identified the best measurement tool for detecting the outcomes of empowerment programs. The GEM was found the most sensitive and the most tangible measure that captures improvements in communication, conflict resolution, decision making and life skill development. The GEM and Australian Unity Wellbeing Index could be recommended as routine measures for empowerment programs assessment among similar remote area workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FWB program survey. Mean responses, pre and post
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Public Service Commission . Census of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander APS Employees. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009.
    1. Berry SL, Crowe TP, Deane FP, Billingham M, Bhagerutty Y. Growth and Empowerment for Indigenous Australians in Substance Abuse Treatment. International Journal of Health and Addiction. 2012;10:970–983. doi: 10.1007/s11469-012-9393-2. - DOI
    1. Brooks RT, Beard J, Steel Z. Factor structure and interpretation of the K10. Psychological Assessment. 2006;18(1):62–70. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.62. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cummins R, Schafer M. Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Melbourne: Deakin University; 2011.
    1. Fulford MD, Enz CA. The Impact Of Empowerment On Service Employees. Journal of Managerial Issues. 1995;7(2):161–175.

LinkOut - more resources