Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):106-18.
doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-015.

Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends

Affiliations
Review

Personalization and Patient Involvement in Decision Support Systems: Current Trends

S Quaglini et al. Yearb Med Inform. .

Abstract

Objectives: This survey aims at highlighting the latest trends (2012-2014) on the development, use, and evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) based decision support systems (DSSs) in medicine, with a particular focus on patient-centered and personalized care.

Methods: We considered papers published on scientific journals, by querying PubMed and Web of ScienceTM. Included studies focused on the implementation or evaluation of ICT-based tools used in clinical practice. A separate search was performed on computerized physician order entry systems (CPOEs), since they are increasingly embedding patient-tailored decision support.

Results: We found 73 papers on DSSs (53 on specific ICT tools) and 72 papers on CPOEs. Although decision support through the delivery of recommendations is frequent (28/53 papers), our review highlighted also DSSs only based on efficient information presentation (25/53). Patient participation in making decisions is still limited (9/53), and mostly focused on risk communication. The most represented medical area is cancer (12%). Policy makers are beginning to be included among stakeholders (6/73), but integration with hospital information systems is still low. Concerning knowledge representation/management issues, we identified a trend towards building inference engines on top of standard data models. Most of the tools (57%) underwent a formal assessment study, even if half of them aimed at evaluating usability and not effectiveness.

Conclusions: Overall, we have noticed interesting evolutions of medical DSSs to improve communication with the patient, consider the economic and organizational impact, and use standard models for knowledge representation. However, systems focusing on patient-centered care still do not seem to be available at large.

Keywords: Decision support systems; clinical; decision aids; decision making; patient empowerment; patient-centered care; shared.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Papers including “shared decision making” (SDM) in their title, published in the last 15 years (source: PubMed).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Publication trend of CPOE-related papers in the last 15 years (search by title, source PubMed)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Review steps and results for DSSs and CPOEs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Summary description of DSS (top) and CPOE (bottom) papers according to the identified dimensions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Peleg M, Tu S. Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine. Yearb Med Inform 2006:72-80. - PubMed
    1. Kachalia A, Mello MM. Defensive medicine--legally necessary but ethically wrong?: Inpatient stress testing for chest pain in low-risk patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013. June 24;173(12):1056-7. - PubMed
    1. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? Soc Sci Med 1997. March;44(5):681-92. - PubMed
    1. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014. January 28;1. - PubMed
    1. Pulley JM, Denny JC, Peterson JF, Bernard GR, Vnencak-Jones CL, Ramirez AH, et al. Operational implementation of prospective genotyping for personalized medicine: the design of the Vanderbilt PREDICT project. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012. July;92(1):87-95. - PMC - PubMed