Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 13;10(1):174-7.
doi: 10.15265/IY-2015-010.

Clinical Research Informatics: Recent Advances and Future Directions

Affiliations

Clinical Research Informatics: Recent Advances and Future Directions

M Dugas. Yearb Med Inform. .

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize significant developments in Clinical Research Informatics (CRI) over the past two years and discuss future directions.

Methods: Survey of advances, open problems and opportunities in this field based on exploration of current literature.

Results: Recent advances are structured according to three use cases of clinical research: Protocol feasibility, patient identification/ recruitment and clinical trial execution.

Discussion: CRI is an evolving, dynamic field of research. Global collaboration, open metadata, content standards with semantics and computable eligibility criteria are key success factors for future developments in CRI.

Keywords: Clinical research informatics; clinical trial execution; open metadata; patient recruitment; protocol feasibility; semantic annotation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Design of medical documentation is a large scale problem and requires global collaboration: Based on 300.000 concepts per data item and 40 items per form there are more possible CRFs than atoms in the universe. [picture source: Wikipedia, Andrew Z. Colvin]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Currently most CRFs are business secrets, which is blocking efficient data exchange between information systems. Open metadata is a key step to foster interoperability.

References

    1. Embi PJ. Clinical research informatics: survey of recent advances and trends in a maturing field. Yearb Med Inform 2013;8(1):178-84. - PubMed
    1. De Moor G, Sundgren M, Kalra D, Schmidt A, Dugas M, Claerhout B, et al. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR-4CR project. J Biomed Inform 2015;53:162-73. - PubMed
    1. Coorevits P, Sundgren M, Klein GO, Bahr A, Claerhout B, Daniel C, et al. Electronic health records: new opportunityes for clinical research. J Intern Med 2013;274(6):547-60. - PubMed
    1. Doods J, Bache R, McGilchrist M, Daniel C, Dugas M, Fritz F; Work Package 7. Piloting the EHR4CR feasibility platform across Europe. Methods Inf Med 2014;53(4):264-8. - PubMed
    1. Bache R, Taweel A, Miles S, Delaney BC. An Eligibility Criteria Query Language for Heterogeneous Data Warehouses. Methods Inf Med 2015;54(1):41-4. - PubMed

MeSH terms