Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 18;5(3):1912-37.
doi: 10.3390/biom5031912.

Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells

Affiliations
Review

Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells

Jan Benada et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Cancer treatments such as radiotherapy and most of the chemotherapies act by damaging DNA of cancer cells. Upon DNA damage, cells stop proliferation at cell cycle checkpoints, which provides them time for DNA repair. Inhibiting the checkpoint allows entry to mitosis despite the presence of DNA damage and can lead to cell death. Importantly, as cancer cells exhibit increased levels of endogenous DNA damage due to an excessive replication stress, inhibiting the checkpoint kinases alone could act as a directed anti-cancer therapy. Here, we review the current status of inhibitors targeted towards the checkpoint effectors and discuss mechanisms of their actions in killing of cancer cells.

Keywords: ATM; ATR; Chk1; DNA damage response; Wee1; cancer; checkpoint; inhibitor; p53; replication stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
DNA damage response activates cell cycle checkpoint. Cell cycle progression is controlled by CDKs that are inactivated by Wee1 kinase and activated by Cdc25A/B/C phosphatases. Induction of DSBs activates ATM/Chk2 pathway, while exposed ssDNA initiates the ATR/Chk1 pathway. Both pathways inactivate Cdc25A/B/C leading to a temporal cell cycle arrest. Activation of p53/p21 pathway is crucial for the G1 checkpoint. The activation of the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway contributes to the checkpoint activation and maintenance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitizing cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents with checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer cells deficient in p53 lack G1 checkpoint and depend on checkpoint kinases to establish G2/M checkpoint. Inhibition of checkpoint kinases in combination with DNA damaging therapy leads to the G2/M checkpoint abrogation, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Notably, healthy cells are protected by p53-dependent response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sensitizing cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents with checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer cells deficient in p53 lack G1 checkpoint and depend on checkpoint kinases to establish G2/M checkpoint. Inhibition of checkpoint kinases in combination with DNA damaging therapy leads to the G2/M checkpoint abrogation, mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Notably, healthy cells are protected by p53-dependent response.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Exploiting the addiction of cancer cells to ATR-Chk1-Wee1 signaling. The activation of oncogenes results in increased CDK activity, hyper-replication, and replication stress. Stalled forks are converted to DSBs. ATR/Chk1/Wee1 kinases oppose CDK2 activation and protect cells from the excessive replication stress. Chk1 and Wee1 protect cells from DNA damage by promoting homologous recombination (HR). Inhibition of ATR/Chk1/Wee1 kinases in cancer cells leads to excessive DNA damage and cell death.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Targeting the weak spots in individual tumors. Individual tumors exhibit various genetic backgrounds and thus have different weak spots. Single targeted therapy can never be efficient in all possible tumor variants. Therefore there is a great need to introduce diagnostic approaches that would, firstly, identify the weak spots of the particular tumor and then choose the effective targeted therapy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lukas J., Lukas C., Bartek J. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1161–1169. doi: 10.1038/ncb2344. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medema R.H., Macurek L. Checkpoint control and cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31:2601–2613. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lemaire M., Mondesert O., Bugler B., Ducommun B. Ability of human Cdc25B phosphatase splice variants to replace the function of the fission yeast Cdc25 cell cycle regulator. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004;5:205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.07.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manke I.A., Nguyen A., Lim D., Stewart M.Q., Elia A.E., Yaffe M.B. Mapkap kinase-2 is a cell cycle checkpoint kinase that regulates the G2/M transition and S phase progression in response to UV irradiation. Mol. Cell. 2005;17:37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uchida S., Watanabe N., Kudo Y., Yoshioka K., Matsunaga T., Ishizaka Y., Nakagama H., Poon R.Y., Yamashita K. SCFβ(TrCP) mediates stress-activated MAPK-induced Cdc25B degradation. J. Cell Sci. 2011;124:2816–2825. doi: 10.1242/jcs.083931. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances