Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;23(10):2846-52.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3758-6. Epub 2015 Aug 23.

Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture

Affiliations

Tibial slope correction combined with second revision ACL produces good knee stability and prevents graft rupture

David Dejour et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Revision ACL reconstruction requires careful analysis of failure causes particularly in cases of two previous graft ruptures. Intrinsic factors as excessive tibial slope or narrow femoral notch increase failure risks but are rarely addressed in revision surgery. The authors report outcomes, at minimum follow-up of 2 years, for second revision ACL reconstructions combined with tibial deflexion osteotomy for correction of excessive slope (>12°).

Methods: Nine patients that underwent second revision ACL reconstruction combined with tibial deflexion osteotomy were retrospectively studied. The mean age was 30.3 ± 4.4 years (median 28; range 26-37), and mean follow-up was 4.0 ± 2.0 years (median 3.6; range 2.0-7.6). Autografts were harvested from the quadriceps tendon (n = 8) or hamstrings (n = 1), and tibial osteotomy was done by anterior closing wedge, without detachment of the patellar tendon, to obtain a slope of 3° to 5°.

Results: All patients had fused osteotomies, stable knees, and there were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean posterior tibial slope decreased from 13.2° ± 2.6° (median 13°; range 12°-18°) preoperatively to 4.4° ± 2.3° (median 4°; range 2°-8°) postoperatively. The mean Lysholm score was 73.8 ± 5.8 (median 74; range 65-82), and the IKDC-SKF was 71.6 ± 6.1 (median 72.8; range 62.2-78.5).

Conclusion: The satisfactory results of second revision ACL reconstruction combined with tibial deflexion osteotomy at minimum follow-up of 2 years suggest that tibia slope correction protects reconstructed ACL from fatigue failure in this study. The authors stress the importance of careful analysis failure causes prior to revision ACL reconstruction, and recommend correction of tibial slope if it exceeds 12°, to reduce the risks of graft retear.

Level of evidence: III.

Keywords: ACL failure; ACL revision; Anterior cruciate ligament; Posterior tibial slope; Tibial closed wedge osteotomy; Tibial deflexion osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Dec;19 Suppl 1:S109-14 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):199-217 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):927-33 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1248-54 - PubMed
    1. J Knee Surg. 2012 Nov;25(5):361-8 - PubMed