The optimal organization of gynecologic oncology services: a systematic review
- PMID: 26300679
- PMCID: PMC4530826
- DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2482
The optimal organization of gynecologic oncology services: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: A system-level organizational guideline for gynecologic oncology was identified by a provincial cancer agency as a key priority based on input from stakeholders, data showing more limited availability of multidisciplinary or specialist care in lower-volume than in higher-volume hospitals in the relevant jurisdiction, and variable rates of staging for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients.
Methods: A systematic review assessed the relationship of the organization of gynecologic oncology services with patient survival and surgical outcomes. The electronic databases medline and embase (ovid: 1996 through 9 January 2015) were searched using terms related to gynecologic malignancies combined with organization of services, patterns of care, and various facility and physician characteristics. Outcomes of interest included overall or disease-specific survival, short-term survival, adequate staging, and degree of cytoreduction or optimal cytoreduction (or both) for ovarian cancer patients by hospital or physician type, and rate of discrepancy in initial diagnoses and intraoperative consultation between non-specialist pathologists and gyne-oncology-specialist pathologists.
Results: One systematic review and sixteen additional primary studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base as a whole was judged to be of lower quality; however, a trend toward improved outcomes with centralization of gynecologic oncology was found, particularly with respect to the gynecologic oncology care of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.
Conclusions: Improvements in outcomes with centralization of gynecologic oncology services can be attributed to a number of factors, including access to specialist care and multidisciplinary team management. Findings of this systematic review should be used with caution because of the limitations of the evidence base; however, an expert consensus process made it possible to create recommendations for implementation.
Keywords: Organization; gynecologic oncology; systematic reviews.
Similar articles
-
Trends in gynecologic cancer care in North America.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Jun;39(2):107-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Apr 6. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22640706 Review.
-
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008. PMID: 21631815
-
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug;(24 Suppl):1-32. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001. PMID: 11569328 Free PMC article.
-
Improving quality and decreasing cost in gynecologic oncology care. Society of gynecologic oncology recommendations for clinical practice.Gynecol Oncol. 2015 May;137(2):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.021. Epub 2015 Feb 28. Gynecol Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25735256
-
Systematic review of prospective studies focused on regionalization of care in surgical oncology.Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1699-1707. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01073-9. Epub 2021 May 24. Updates Surg. 2021. PMID: 34028698
Cited by
-
Integrative deep learning and radiomics analysis for ovarian tumor classification and diagnosis: a multicenter large-sample comparative study.Radiol Med. 2025 Jun;130(6):889-904. doi: 10.1007/s11547-025-02006-x. Epub 2025 Apr 1. Radiol Med. 2025. PMID: 40167932
-
Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):631-637. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06752-5. Epub 2022 Aug 22. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 35994107
-
Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01251-2. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38622546 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic segmentation model and machine learning model grounded in ultrasound radiomics for distinguishing between low malignant risk and intermediate-high malignant risk of adnexal masses.Insights Imaging. 2025 Jan 13;16(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01874-7. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39804536 Free PMC article.
-
Gynaecological Oncology in India: Past, Present and Future.Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(Suppl 1):76-80. doi: 10.1007/s13193-022-01668-7. Epub 2022 Oct 28. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36691500 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sankaranarayanan R, Ferlay J. Worldwide burden of gynecological cancer. In: Preedy VR, Watson RR, editors. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. New York, NY: Springer; 2010. pp. 803–23. - DOI
-
- Marth C, Hiebl S, Oberaigner W, Winter R, Leodolter S, Sevelda P. Influence of department volume on survival for ovarian cancer: results from a prospective quality assurance program of the Austrian Association for Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:94–102. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e31819915cb. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous