Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug;6(4):120-40.
doi: 10.1177/2042098615591802.

European Union pharmacovigilance capabilities: potential for the new legislation

Affiliations
Review

European Union pharmacovigilance capabilities: potential for the new legislation

John Joseph Borg et al. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

European Directives and Regulations introduced between late 2010 and 2012 have substantially overhauled pharmacovigilance processes across the European Union (EU). In this review, the implementation of the pharmacovigilance legislative framework by EU regulators is examined with the aim of mapping Directive 2010/84/EU and Regulation EC No. 1235/2010 against their aspired objectives of strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU. A comprehensive review of the current state of affairs of the progress made by EU regulators is presented in this paper. Our review shows that intense efforts by regulators and industry to fulfil legislative obligations have resulted in major positive shifts in pharmacovigilance. Harmonized decision making, transparency in decision processes with patient involvement, information accessibility to the public, patient adverse drug reaction reporting, efforts in communication and enhanced cooperation between member states to maximize resource utilization and minimize duplication of efforts are observed.

Keywords: Pharmacovigilance and Risk Assessment Committee; adverse drug reactions; drug safety; periodic safety update reports; pharmacovigilance; post authorization safety studies; regulatory affairs; signal detection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The author declares no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

References

    1. Biihrlen B., Reiß T., Beckmann C. (2006) Assessment of the European Community System of Pharmacovigilance. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
    1. Borg J., Aislaitner G., Pirozynski M., Mifsud S. (2011) Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 34: 187–197. - PubMed
    1. Daniels S. (2013) EU Pharmacovigilance Legislation – One Year Later. TranScrip Partners, LLP, http://www.transcrip-partners.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/EU-Pharmaco...
    1. European Commission (2008) Volume 9A of The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union – Guidelines on Pharmacovigilance for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Commission; http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-9/pdf/vol9a_09-2008_en.pdf
    1. European Commission (2012) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 520/2012 of 19 June 2012 on the performance of pharmacovigilance activities provided for in Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official J Eur Union 159: 5–25.

LinkOut - more resources