Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug 10;3(7):e463.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000455. eCollection 2015 Jul.

Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Revisional Procedures in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Trauma

Affiliations

Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Revisional Procedures in Patients with Complex Maxillofacial Trauma

Mansher Singh et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. .

Abstract

Background: In patients with panfacial fractures and distorted anatomic landmarks of zygomatic and orbital complex, there is a risk of zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) malpositioning even with the best efforts for surgical repair. This results in increased number of additional procedures to achieve accurate positioning.

Methods: We describe the usage of intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomographic (CT) scan for ZMC malpositioning in a representative patient with panfacial fractures.

Results: We have successfully used intraoperative CT scan for ZMC malpositioning in 3 patients. The representative patient had ZMC malposition after the initial attempt of surgical repair without any intraoperative imaging. On using intraoperative CT scan during the next attempt, we were able to reposition the ZMC accurately.

Conclusions: Intraoperative CT scan might improve the accuracy of ZMC positioning and decrease the chances of potential additional surgeries. In patients with distorted anatomical landmarks and panfacial fractures, it can be especially helpful toward correcting ZMC malposition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. The Article Processing Charge was paid for by the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Anteroposterior view of the patient at the time of initial presentation. Note the apparent facial widening, telecanthus, and enophthalmos on the right side of the patient.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Postoperative CT scan after initial revisional procedure without the use of intraoperative imaging. Note the position of the right zygoma compared with the left with increase in the right-sided orbital volume.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Initial intraoperative CT scan at the start of the procedure with measurements taken of both orbits for comparison.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Postoperative (2 weeks) CT scan demonstrating adequate reduction of the right zygoma and similar orbital measurement [32.97 mm × 33.93 mm (R) vs 32.97 mm × 34.41 mm (L)] and volumes.

References

    1. van den Bergh B, Karagozoglu KH, Heymans MW, et al. Aetiology and incidence of maxillofacial trauma in Amsterdam: a retrospective analysis of 579 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40:e165–e169. - PubMed
    1. van Hout WM, Van Cann EM, Abbink JH, et al. An epidemiological study of maxillofacial fractures requiring surgical treatment at a tertiary trauma centre between 2005 and 2010. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:416–420. - PubMed
    1. Forouzanfar T, Salentijn E, Peng G, et al. A 10-year analysis of the “Amsterdam” protocol in the treatment of zygomatic complex fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;41:616–622. - PubMed
    1. Salentijn EG, Boverhoff J, Heymans MW, et al. The clinical and radiographical characteristics of zygomatic complex fractures: a comparison between the surgically and non-surgically treated patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013;4:214–218. - PubMed
    1. Wilde F, Lorenz K, Ebner AK, et al. Intraoperative imaging with a 3D C-arm system after zygomatico-orbital complex fracture reduction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:894–910. - PubMed