Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 6:3:110.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00110. eCollection 2015.

Building Better Environmental Risk Assessments

Affiliations
Review

Building Better Environmental Risk Assessments

Raymond Layton et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Risk assessment is a reasoned, structured approach to address uncertainty based on scientific and technical evidence. It forms the foundation for regulatory decision-making, which is bound by legislative and policy requirements, as well as the need for making timely decisions using available resources. In order to be most useful, environmental risk assessments (ERAs) for genetically modified (GM) crops should provide consistent, reliable, and transparent results across all types of GM crops, traits, and environments. The assessments must also separate essential information from scientific or agronomic data of marginal relevance or value for evaluating risk and complete the assessment in a timely fashion. Challenges in conducting ERAs differ across regulatory systems - examples are presented from Canada, Malaysia, and Argentina. One challenge faced across the globe is the conduct of risk assessments with limited resources. This challenge can be overcome by clarifying risk concepts, placing greater emphasis on data critical to assess environmental risk (for example, phenotypic and plant performance data rather than molecular data), and adapting advances in risk analysis from other relevant disciplines.

Keywords: GMO; genetically engineered crops; non-target organisms; risk assessment; risk characterization; risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beech C. J., Nagaraju J., Vasan S. S., Rose R. I., Othman R. Y., Pillai V., et al. (2009). Risk analysis of a hypothetical open field release of a self-limiting transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquito strain to combat dengue. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 17, 99–111.
    1. Harris A. F., Nimmo D., McKemey A. R., Kelly N., Scaife S., Donnelly C. A., et al. (2011). Field performance of engineered male mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1034–1037.10.1038/nbt.2019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. James C. (2013). Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2013. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA. ISAAA Brief No. 46.
    1. Keese P. (2013). “Building an effective biosafety regulatory system: the nuts and bolts,” in Collection of Biosafety Reviews, Vol. 8 (Trieste: International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology; ), 10–39.
    1. Keese P. K., Robold A. V., Myers R. C., Weisman S., Smith J. (2014). Applying a weed risk assessment approach to GM crops. Transgenic Res. 23, 957–969.10.1007/s11248-013-9745-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources