Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;70(2):259-87, ii.

The Limits of FDA's Authority to Regulate Clinical Research Involving High-Throughput DNA Sequencing

The Limits of FDA's Authority to Regulate Clinical Research Involving High-Throughput DNA Sequencing

Barbara J Evans. Food Drug Law J. 2015.

Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently signaled its interest in subjecting clinical investigations that employ high-throughput gene sequencing, also called next-generation sequencing, to the agency's Part 812 investigational device exemption (IDE) regulation. Genome sequencing--for reasons explained in this article--blurs the line between categories of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) research that FDA traditionally has regulated and categories of research that FDA traditionally has not regulated. This blurring creates a risk that FDA may overstep its proper authority to regulate fundamental genomic and medical research. This article surveys the legal limits of FDA's authority'to subject genomic research to its IDE requirements. Section 1 explains that FDA has authority to regulate clinical investigations of devices, but is not authorized to regulate investigations that merely use devices to expand medical knowledge or to conduct fundamental research, unless special circumstances apply. Section 2 discusses the special circumstances that can expand or limit FDA's authority to regulate a specific clinical investigation, and Section 3 demonstrates these using an example. Section 4 explores concerns that arose in recent years about risks to human subjects in a certain type of investigation known as sponsor-investigator studies. In response to these concerns, FDA has suggested that it can regulate such studies in ways that threaten to expand FDA's regulation of research at academic medical centers beyond its proper scope. These concerns, while valid in some academic research contexts, seem inapposite in the setting of genomic research programs funded by responsible.entities such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Moreover, FDA's regulations do not. appear to support the proposition that FDA can regulate sponsor-investigator studies more expansively than it regulates other studies. Section 5 explores specific ways that NIH, clinical investigators, and FDA might work together to rationalize FDA's regulation of NIH-funded-genomic research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. See, e.g., Joint Nat'l Insts. of Health-Dep't of Energy Working Grp. on Ethical, Legal, & Soc. Implications of Human Genome Research, Promoting Safe and Effective Genetic Testing in the United States (Neil A. Holtzman & Michael S. Watson eds., 1997); Secretary's Advisory Comm. on Genetic Testing, Nat'l Insts. Of Health, Enhancing the Oversight of Genetic Tests (2000), available at http://osp.od.nih.gov/sites/default/files/oversight_report.pdf.

    1. Food & Drug Admin., Draft Guidance: Framework for Regulatory Oversight of Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) (2014) [hereinafter FDA Framework for LDTs].

    1. Food & Drug Admin., Draft Guidance: FDA Notification and Medical Device Reporting for Laboratory Developed Tests (LDTs) (2014).

    1. Food & Drug Admin., Optimizing FDA's Regulatory Oversight of Next Generation Sequencing Diagnostic Tests–Preliminary Discussion Paper (2014) [hereinafter Optimizing FDA's Oversight of NGS Tests], available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/UCM427869.pdf.

    1. See, e.g., Clement Paul D., Tribe Lawrence H., Laboratory Testing Services , As the Practice of Medicine, Cannot Be Regulated as Medical Devices (2015) [hereinafter American Clinical Laboratory Association White Paper], available at http://www.acla.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Tribe-Clement-White-Paper-1-6-15.pdf; Evans James P., Watson Michael S. Genetic Testing and FDA Regulation: Overregulation Threatens the Emergence of Genomic Medicine. 2015:669. 313 JAMA 669. Javitt Gail. FDA's Legally-Suspect Shift of Clinical Lab Test Regulations Through Guidance Documents. Wash. Legal Found. Legal Pulse; Aug 20, 2014. http://wlflegalpulse.com/2014/08/20/fdas-legally-suspect-shift-of-clinical-lab-test-regulation-through-guidance-documents/ Joshua Sharfstein FDA. Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Diagnostic Tests: Protect the Public, Advance the Science. 2015 313 JAMA 667.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources