Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;15(9):34-42.
doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162.

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions

Christine Grady  1 , Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim, Bernie Lo, Rebecca Pentz, Laura Rodriguez, Carol Weil, Benjamin S Wilfond, David Wendler
Affiliations

Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions

Christine Grady et al. Am J Bioeth. 2015.

Abstract

Different types of consent are used to obtain human biospecimens for future research. This variation has resulted in confusion regarding what research is permitted, inadvertent constraints on future research, and research proceeding without consent. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center's Department of Bioethics held a workshop to consider the ethical acceptability of addressing these concerns by using broad consent for future research on stored biospecimens. Multiple bioethics scholars, who have written on these issues, discussed the reasons for consent, the range of consent strategies, and gaps in our understanding, and concluded with a proposal for broad initial consent coupled with oversight and, when feasible, ongoing provision of information to donors. This article describes areas of agreement and areas that need more research and dialogue. Given recent proposed changes to the Common Rule, and new guidance regarding storing and sharing data and samples, this is an important and timely topic.

Keywords: Keywords:; biomedical research; informed consent; regulatory issues; research ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Alter MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Nainan OV, McQuillan GM, Gao F, Moyer LA, Kaslow RA, Margolis HS. The Prevalence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, 1988 through 1994’. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;341(8):556–562. - PubMed
    1. Bédard K, Wallace S, Lazor S, Knoppers B. Potential Conflicts in Governance Mechanisms Used in Population Biobanks. In: Kaye Jane, Stranger Mark., editors. Principles and Practice in Biobank Governance. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2009; 2009. pp. 217–227.
    1. Botkin J, Rothwell E, Anderson R, Stark L, Mitchell J. Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research. J Community Genetics. 2014;5(3):205–213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brothers KB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW. Two Large-Scale Surveys on Community Attitudes toward an Opt-out Biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 2011;155(12):2982–2990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brothers KB, Clayton EW. Parental Perspectives on a Pediatric Human Non-Subjects Biobank. AJOB Primary Research. 2012;3(3):21–29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources