Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Sensory Testing to Discriminate Inflammatory Toothache and Intraoral Neuropathic Pain
- PMID: 26307507
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.07.006
Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Sensory Testing to Discriminate Inflammatory Toothache and Intraoral Neuropathic Pain
Abstract
Introduction: A differential diagnosis between inflammatory toothache (IT) and intraoral neuropathic pain is challenging. The aim of this diagnostic study was to quantify somatosensory function of subjects with IT (acute pulpitis) and atypical odontalgia (AO, intraoral neuropathic pain) and healthy volunteers and to quantify how accurately quantitative sensory testing (QST) discriminates an IT or AO diagnosis.
Methods: The sample consisted of 60 subjects equally divided (n = 20) into 3 groups: (1) IT, (2) AO, and (3) control. A sequence of 4 QST methods was performed over the dentoalveolar mucosa in the apical maxillar or mandibular area: mechanical detection threshold, pain detection threshold (PDT), dynamic mechanical allodynia, and temporal summation. One-way analysis of variance, Tukey post hoc analyses, and z score transformation were applied to the data. In addition, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio of the QST methods were calculated (α = 5%).
Results: Somatosensory abnormalities were found for the AO group, which is consistent with a low detection threshold to touch and pain and the presence of mechanical allodynia. For the IT group, no somatosensory abnormality was observed when compared with the control group. The most accurate QST to discriminate the diagnostic differences between IT and healthy individuals is the PDT. The diagnostic differences between AO and healthy individuals and between IT and AO are best discriminated with the mechanical detection threshold, PDT, and dynamic mechanical allodynia.
Conclusions: The proposed QST methods may aid in the differential diagnosis between IT and AO with strong accuracy and may be used as complementary diagnostic tests.
Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; inflammatory toothache; intraoral neuropathic pain; persistent pain; quantitative sensory testing.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Chronic intraoral pain--assessment of diagnostic methods and prognosis.Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011;(220):7-91. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2011. PMID: 22338784
-
Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study.Pain. 2008 Oct 15;139(2):333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.05.002. Epub 2008 Jun 20. Pain. 2008. PMID: 18571324
-
Pain from Dental Implant Placement, Inflammatory Pulpitis Pain, and Neuropathic Pain Present Different Somatosensory Profiles.J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Winter;31(1):19-29. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1680. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017. PMID: 28118417
-
Atypical odontalgia - pathophysiology and clinical management.J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jan;35(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01813.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2008. PMID: 18190356 Review.
-
Quantitative sensory testing in measurement of neuropathic pain phenomena and other sensory abnormalities.Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):641-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a68c7e. Clin J Pain. 2009. PMID: 19692807 Review.
Cited by
-
Applications of sensory and physiological measurement in oral-facial dental pain.Spec Care Dentist. 2018 Nov;38(6):395-404. doi: 10.1111/scd.12323. Epub 2018 Sep 8. Spec Care Dentist. 2018. PMID: 30194771 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and other orofacial pain: overcoming challenges in diagnosis and management.Br Dent J. 2025 Apr;238(7):517-526. doi: 10.1038/s41415-025-8441-9. Epub 2025 Apr 11. Br Dent J. 2025. PMID: 40217034 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources