Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;40(2):333-7.
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.165. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

Affiliations

Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

C Sikorski et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Despite strong indications of a high prevalence of weight-related stigmatization in individuals with obesity, limited attention has been given to the role of weight discrimination in examining the stigma obesity. Studies, up to date, rely on a limited basis of data sets and additional studies are needed to confirm the findings of previous studies. In particular, data for Europe are lacking, and are needed in light of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice that addressed weight-based discrimination.

Methods: The data were derived from a large representative telephone survey in Germany (n=3003). The dependent variable, weight-based discrimination, was assessed with a one-item question. The lifetime prevalence of weight discrimination across different sociodemographic variables was determined. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of independent and dependent variables. A sub-group analysis was conducted analyzing all participants with a body mass index ⩾25 kg m(-)(2).

Results: The overall prevalence of weight-based discrimination was 7.3%. Large differences, however, were observed regarding weight status. In normal weight and overweight participants the prevalence was 5.6%, but this number doubled in participants with obesity class I (10.2%), and quadrupled in participants with obesity class II (18.7%) and underweight (19.7%). In participants with obesity class III, every third participant reported accounts of weight-based discrimination (38%). In regression models, after adjustment, the associations of weight status and female gender (odds ratio: 2.59, P<0.001) remained highly significant.

Conclusions: Discrimination seems to be an ubiquitary phenomenon at least for some groups that are at special risk, such as heavier individuals and women. Our findings therefore emphasize the need for research and intervention on weight discrimination among adults with obesity, including anti-discrimination legislation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46924 - PubMed
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 May;16(5):1129-34 - PubMed
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jun;18(6):1226-34 - PubMed
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan;22(1):79-85 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39325 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms