Quantum walk coherences on a dynamical percolation graph
- PMID: 26311434
- PMCID: PMC4550913
- DOI: 10.1038/srep13495
Quantum walk coherences on a dynamical percolation graph
Abstract
Coherent evolution governs the behaviour of all quantum systems, but in nature it is often subjected to influence of a classical environment. For analysing quantum transport phenomena quantum walks emerge as suitable model systems. In particular, quantum walks on percolation structures constitute an attractive platform for studying open system dynamics of random media. Here, we present an implementation of quantum walks differing from the previous experiments by achieving dynamical control of the underlying graph structure. We demonstrate the evolution of an optical time-multiplexed quantum walk over six double steps, revealing the intricate interplay between the internal and external degrees of freedom. The observation of clear non-Markovian signatures in the coin space testifies the high coherence of the implementation and the extraordinary degree of control of all system parameters. Our work is the proof-of-principle experiment of a quantum walk on a dynamical percolation graph, paving the way towards complex simulation of quantum transport in random media.
Figures
for n steps. The input state (blue arrow) is evolved (red arrow) and measured tomographically at every step. (b) Implementation scheme of the example, the
and
operators are represented by filled and hollow diamonds, respectively. (c) Setup scheme of the time-multiplexed PQW. According to the implementation scheme the walker always alternates between paths A and B. The colour coding is used to mark corresponding entities in both panels. We average over all patterns to obtain the open system’s dynamics.
. Note that the height of a bar is unchanged from one step to the next if the site is disconnected. The high similarity (on average 95.6%) between the empirically observed probabilities and those from the ideal process makes a graphical comparison unnecessary.
of the coin: observed (solid red lines), ideal model (dashed lines), and realistic model (blue, solid lines). (b) Hilbert–Schmidt distance
between
and
, the maximally mixed, asymptotic state: observed data (red), ideal model (turquoise), and realistic model (blue). The insets show the experimental density matrix for the three chosen steps. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. The depicted error bars are calculated using a numerical simulation of all relevant systematic errors and are discussed in detail in the Methods section.References
-
- Lewenstein M. et al. Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond. Advances in Physics 56, 243–379 (2007).
-
- Johnson T. H., Clark S. R. & Jaksch D. What is a quantum simulator? EPJ Quantum Technology 1, 10 (2014).
-
- Britton J. W. et al. Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins. Nature 484, 489–492 (2012). - PubMed
-
- Meyer D. A. From quantum cellular automata to quantum lattice gases. Journal of Statistical Physics 85, 551–574 (1996).
-
- Kempe J. Quantum random walks: An introductory overview. Contemporary Physics 44, 307–327 (2003).
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
