Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec;53(12):3723-8.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.02103-15.

Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness

Review

Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness

Matthew J Binnicker. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially among young children and immunocompromised patients. Diarrhea may result from infection with a variety of microbial pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, or parasites. Historically, the diagnosis of infectious diarrhea has been made using microscopy, antigen tests, culture, and real-time PCR. A combination of these traditional tests is often required due to the inability to distinguish between infectious etiologies based on the clinical presentation alone. Recently, several multiplex molecular assays have been developed for the detection of gastrointestinal pathogens directly from clinical stool samples. These panels allow for the detection and identification of up to 20 pathogens in as little as 1 h. This review will focus on the multiplex molecular panels that have received clearance from the FDA for the diagnosis of diarrheal disease and will highlight issues related to test performance, result interpretation, and cost-effectiveness of these new molecular diagnostic tools.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Comparison of workflow, throughput, and turnaround time among three commercial, FDA-cleared multiplex GI platforms. (A) The Luminex xTag GPP assay requires an initial sample preparation step (45 to 60 min), followed by nucleic acid extraction (∼45 min) and multiplex PCR using a standard thermocycler (2.5 h). Subsequently, the amplified product is incubated with tagged beads to allow for hybridization (1 h), and, finally, data are acquired and analyzed on either the Magpix or Luminex 100/200 analyzers (∼10 min). (B) The Nanosphere Verigene enteric pathogens (EP) test involves pipetting 200 μl of sample into a supplied extraction tray. The extraction tray, reagents, and test cartridge are then loaded into the Verigene Processor SP (∼2 min). The Processor SP automates nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and hybridization with gold nanoparticles. Finally, the test cartridge is removed from the Processor and inserted into the Verigene Reader for data analysis, with a total turnaround time of ∼2 h per test. (C) The BioFire FilmArray GI panel uses a loading station to facilitate the addition of hydration solution and patient sample into the test pouch via a vacuum-controlled syringe (∼2 min). Once the sample has been added, the test pouch is inserted into the FilmArray instrument, which then automates nucleic acid extraction, nested PCR, and data acquisition using melting curve analysis (∼60 min).
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Diarrheal disease. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs330/en/ Accessed 9 July 2015.
    1. Schlenker C, Surawicz CM. 2009. Emerging infections of the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 23:89–99. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2008.11.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hatchette TF, Farina D. 2011. Infectious diarrhea: when to test and when to treat. CMAJ 183:339–344. doi:10.1503/cmaj.091495. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham SA, Sloan LM, Nyre LM, Vetter EA, Mandrekar J, Patel R. 2010. Three-hour molecular detection of Campylobacter, Salmonella, Yersinia, and Shigella species in feces with accuracy as high as that of culture. J Clin Microbiol 48:2929–2933. doi:10.1128/JCM.00339-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karre T, Sloan L, Patel R, Mandrekar J, Rosenblatt J. 2011. Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol 49:725–727. doi:10.1128/JCM.01028-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms