Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):466-74.
doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.0094.2577.

Assessment of disinfection of hospital surfaces using different monitoring methods

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Adriano Menis Ferreira  1 , Denise de Andrade  2 , Marcelo Alessandro Rigotti  1 , Margarete Teresa Gottardo de Almeida  3 , Odanir Garcia Guerra  1 , Aires Garcia dos Santos Junior  4
Affiliations

Assessment of disinfection of hospital surfaces using different monitoring methods

[Article in English, Portuguese, Spanish]
Adriano Menis Ferreira et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: to assess the efficiency of cleaning/disinfection of surfaces of an Intensive Care Unit.

Method: descriptive-exploratory study with quantitative approach conducted over the course of four weeks. Visual inspection, bioluminescence adenosine triphosphate and microbiological indicators were used to indicate cleanliness/disinfection. Five surfaces (bed rails, bedside tables, infusion pumps, nurses' counter, and medical prescription table) were assessed before and after the use of rubbing alcohol at 70% (w/v), totaling 160 samples for each method. Non-parametric tests were used considering statistically significant differences at p<0.05.

Results: after the cleaning/disinfection process, 87.5, 79.4 and 87.5% of the surfaces were considered clean using the visual inspection, bioluminescence adenosine triphosphate and microbiological analyses, respectively. A statistically significant decrease was observed in the disapproval rates after the cleaning process considering the three assessment methods; the visual inspection was the least reliable.

Conclusion: the cleaning/disinfection method was efficient in reducing microbial load and organic matter of surfaces, however, these findings require further study to clarify aspects related to the efficiency of friction, its frequency, and whether or not there is association with other inputs to achieve improved results of the cleaning/disinfection process.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Otter JA, Yezli S, Salkeld JA, French GLT. Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41 Supp l5:6–11. - PubMed
    1. Ferreira AM, Andrade D de, Rigotti MA, Ferreira MVF. Condition of cleanliness of surfaces close to patients in an intensive care unit. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2011;19(3):557–564.
    1. Boyce JM, Havill NL, Havill HL, Mangione E, Dumigan DG, Moore BA. Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(12):1187–1193. - PubMed
    1. Dancer SJ. Importance of the environment in meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition: the case for hospital cleaning. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:101–113. - PubMed
    1. Goodman ER, Platt R, Bass R, Onderdon AB, Yokoe DS, Huang SS. Impact of an environmental cleaning intervention on the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci on surfaces in intenstive care unit rooms. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:593–599. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances