The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density
- PMID: 26315554
- PMCID: PMC4633314
- DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0330
The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density
Abstract
Background: Understanding how changes in body mass index (BMI) relate to changes in mammographic density is necessary to evaluate adjustment for BMI gain/loss in studies of change in density and breast cancer risk. Increase in BMI has been associated with a decrease in percent density, but the effect on change in absolute dense area or volume is unclear.
Methods: We examined the association between change in BMI and change in volumetric breast density among 24,556 women in the San Francisco Mammography Registry from 2007 to 2013. Height and weight were self-reported at the time of mammography. Breast density was assessed using single x-ray absorptiometry measurements. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between BMI and dense volume (DV), non-dense volume (NDV), and percent dense volume (PDV) were assessed using multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for demographics, risk factors, and reproductive history.
Results: In cross-sectional analysis, BMI was positively associated with DV [β, 2.95 cm(3); 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.69-3.21] and inversely associated with PDV (β, -2.03%; 95% CI, -2.09, -1.98). In contrast, increasing BMI was longitudinally associated with a decrease in both DV (β, -1.01 cm(3); 95% CI, -1.59, -0.42) and PDV (β, -1.17%; 95% CI, -1.31, -1.04). These findings were consistent for both pre- and postmenopausal women.
Conclusion: Our findings support an inverse association between change in BMI and change in PDV. The association between increasing BMI and decreasing DV requires confirmation.
Impact: Longitudinal studies of PDV and breast cancer risk, or those using PDV as an indicator of breast cancer risk, should evaluate adjustment for change in BMI.
©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
References
- 
    - Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, Fishell EK, Little LE, Miller AB, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: Results from the canadian national breast screening study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:670–5. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Knight JA, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, et al. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast disease. 1998;10:113–26. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, Parekh N, Salane M, Brinton LA, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: Effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1622–9. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Warner E, Lockwood G, Tritchler D, Boyd NF. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: A meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev. 1992;16:67–72. - PubMed
 
- 
    - Ding J, Warren R, Warsi I, Day N, Thompson D, Brady M, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of using standard mammogram form to predict breast cancer risk: Case-control study. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers prevention. 2008;17:1074–81. - PubMed
 
 
        