The Debrisoft(®) Monofilament Debridement Pad for Use in Acute or Chronic Wounds: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
- PMID: 26315567
- PMCID: PMC4661219
- DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0195-0
The Debrisoft(®) Monofilament Debridement Pad for Use in Acute or Chronic Wounds: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance
Abstract
As part of its Medical Technology Evaluation Programme, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited a manufacturer to provide clinical and economic evidence for the evaluation of the Debrisoft(®) monofilament debridement pad for use in acute or chronic wounds. The University of Birmingham and Brunel University, acting as a consortium, was commissioned to act as an External Assessment Centre (EAC) for NICE, independently appraising the submission. This article is an overview of the original evidence submitted, the EAC's findings and the final NICE guidance issued. The sponsor submitted a simple cost analysis to estimate the costs of using Debrisoft(®) to debride wounds compared with saline and gauze, hydrogel and larvae. Separate analyses were conducted for applications in home and applications in a clinic setting. The analysis took an UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective. It incorporated the costs of the technologies and supplementary technologies (such as dressings) and the costs of their application by a district nurse. The sponsor concluded that Debrisoft(®) was cost saving relative to the comparators. The EAC made amendments to the sponsor analysis to correct for errors and to reflect alternative assumptions. Debrisoft(®) remained cost saving in most analyses and savings ranged from £77 to £222 per patient compared with hydrogel, from £97 to £347 compared with saline and gauze, and from £180 to £484 compared with larvae depending on the assumptions included in the analysis and whether debridement took place in a home or clinic setting. All analyses were severely limited by the available data on effectiveness, in particular a lack of comparative studies and that the effectiveness data for the comparators came from studies reporting different clinical endpoints compared with Debrisoft(®). The Medical Technologies Advisory Committee made a positive recommendation for adoption of Debrisoft(®) and this has been published as a NICE medical technology guidance (MTG17).
Similar articles
-
Parafricta Bootees and Undergarments to Reduce Skin Breakdown in People with or at Risk of Pressure Ulcers: A NICE Medical Technologies Guidance.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Dec;14(6):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0245-2. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016. PMID: 27116358 Review.
-
Pipeline™ embolization device for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: a NICE Medical Technology Guidance.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Feb;11(1):5-13. doi: 10.1007/s40258-012-0005-x. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013. PMID: 23341264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
EXOGEN ultrasound bone healing system for long bone fractures with non-union or delayed healing: a NICE medical technology guidance.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Oct;12(5):477-84. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0117-6. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014. PMID: 25060830 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Debrisoft is a wound debridement product, not a wound dressing.Nurs Stand. 2014 May 13;28(36):35. doi: 10.7748/ns2014.05.28.36.35.s46. Nurs Stand. 2014. PMID: 24802464
-
Venetoclax for Treating Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):399-406. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0599-9. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29222670 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A comparative study on the cellular viability and debridement efficiency of antimicrobial-based wound dressings.Int Wound J. 2020 Feb;17(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13234. Epub 2019 Oct 27. Int Wound J. 2020. PMID: 31657125 Free PMC article.
-
Wound debridement products and techniques: clinical examples and literature review.Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Jun;39(3):479-490. doi: 10.5114/ada.2022.117572. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022. PMID: 35950126 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Novel In Vitro Scrubber Model for Evaluating Wound Cleansing on Biofilms.Wound Repair Regen. 2025 Jul-Aug;33(4):e70063. doi: 10.1111/wrr.70063. Wound Repair Regen. 2025. PMID: 40742213 Free PMC article.
-
Challenging passivity in venous leg ulcer care - the ABC model of management.Int Wound J. 2016 Dec;13(6):1378-1384. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12608. Epub 2016 May 5. Int Wound J. 2016. PMID: 27146452 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Posnett JFP. The burden of chronic wounds in the UK. Nurs Times. 2008;104(3):44–45. - PubMed
-
- Venous leg ulcer: NHS Choices; 2014. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Leg-ulcer-venous/Pages/Introduction.aspx. Accessed Jul 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials