Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Oct;38(10):869-88.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0336-2.

Safety Profile of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Safety Profile of Certolizumab Pegol in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alice Capogrosso Sansone et al. Drug Saf. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an anti-tumor necrosis factor PEGylated Fab' fragment of a humanized monoclonal antibody, is currently approved for treatment of some immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). To our knowledge, no systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the overall safety profile of CZP has been performed.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the adverse event (AE) patterns of CZP versus a control in patients with IMIDs.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the FDA database for clinical trials up to March 2014. Eligible studies were those that compared the safety profile of CZP to a control group in patients with IMIDs. The following data were extracted: number of patients experiencing AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), adverse drug reactions (ADRs), withdrawals due to AEs, fatal AEs, infectious AEs and SAEs, upper respiratory tract infections, injection-site reactions, neoplasms, and tuberculosis.

Results: A total of 2023 references were identified and 18 randomized controlled trials were included. The main pooled risk ratios of CZP-treated versus control patients were as follows: AEs 1.09 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.04-1.14), SAEs 1.50 (95% CI 1.21-1.86), ADRs 1.20 (95% CI 1.03-1.39), infectious AEs 1.28 (95% CI 1.13-1.45), infectious SAEs 2.17 (95% CI 1.36-3.47), and upper respiratory tract infections 1.34 (95% CI 1.15-1.57).

Conclusion: Safety data on CZP suggest an overall favorable tolerability profile, with infections being the most common AE. However, CZP-treated patients had a twofold higher risk of infectious SAEs than control patients. Large observational studies and data from national registries are needed to detect rare AEs, which might occur after long-term exposures to CZP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Oct;41(10):1133-7 - PubMed
    1. Nat Immunol. 2001 Sep;2(9):771-3 - PubMed
    1. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1972;498:1-25 - PubMed
    1. J Immunol. 2012 Apr 1;188(7):3169-78 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):96-103 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances