Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with end-to-side coaptation between the jump interpositional nerve graft and hypoglossal nerve: Outcome and duration of preoperative paralysis
- PMID: 26316293
- DOI: 10.1002/micr.22393
Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with end-to-side coaptation between the jump interpositional nerve graft and hypoglossal nerve: Outcome and duration of preoperative paralysis
Abstract
Background: In this report, we described the use of hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with end-to-side coaptation between the jump interpositional nerve graft and the hypoglossal nerve for facial reanimation and analyzed the relationship between the outcome of surgery and duration of preoperative paralysis.
Methods: We performed hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with the jump interpositional nerve graft on nine men and 10 women with unilateral complete facial paralysis. The patients, with a mean age of 39.7 ± 18.1 years (range, 8-65 years) at the time of surgery, experienced preoperative paralysis ranging from 1 to 150 months (mean, 16.9 ± 34.9 months). The movement of the corners of the mouth was evaluated 12 months after surgery using a unique method based on the House-Brackmann grading scale.
Results: The mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 1.6 years (range, 3-9 years). The movement of the corners of mouth was classified as excellent in two cases, good in seven cases, fair in two cases, and poor in eight cases. Nine of the 11 cases with preoperative paralysis of 6 months or less had excellent or good results, whereas none of the eight cases with preoperative paralysis of 7 months or longer yielded excellent or good results, showing a significant difference (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: To achieve successful reanimation of the corners of the mouth, hypoglossal-facial neurorrhaphy with end-to-side coaptation between the jump interpositional nerve graft and the hypoglossal nerve should be performed within 6 months after the onset of facial nerve paralysis. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:460-466, 2016.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Neurorrhaphy for Facial Reanimation with Interpositional Graft: Outcome in 23 Patients and the Impact of Timing on the Outcome.World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e688-e693. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.124. Epub 2019 Mar 4. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30844532
-
Hypoglossal-facial nerve "side-to-side" neurorrhaphy for facial paralysis resulting from closed temporal bone fractures.Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018;36(4):443-457. doi: 10.3233/RNN-170794. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29889081
-
Combination of hypoglossal-facial nerve jump graft by end-to-side neurorrhaphy and cross-face nerve graft for the treatment of facial paralysis.J Reconstr Microsurg. 2007 May;23(4):181-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-974654. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2007. PMID: 17530609
-
[Clinical and electrophysiologic studies of facial nerve function after hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis].Laryngorhinootologie. 1999 May;78(5):244-53. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996866. Laryngorhinootologie. 1999. PMID: 10412133 Review. German.
-
Comparison between VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation techniques for early facial nerve reanimation after surgical intra-cranial injuries: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the functional outcomes.Neurosurg Rev. 2021 Feb;44(1):153-161. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01231-z. Epub 2020 Jan 7. Neurosurg Rev. 2021. PMID: 31912333
Cited by
-
Outcome of a graduated minimally invasive facial reanimation in patients with facial paralysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Aug;274(8):3241-3249. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4551-6. Epub 2017 Apr 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28391532
-
A comparative retrospective study: hypoglossofacial versus masseterofacial nerve anastomosis using Sunnybrook facial grading system.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;276(1):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5186-y. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30377760
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical