Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Feb 5;11(2):363-8.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.06010615. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

Quality Measures for Dialysis: Time for a Balanced Scorecard

Alan S Kliger  1
Affiliations
Review

Quality Measures for Dialysis: Time for a Balanced Scorecard

Alan S Kliger. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Recent federal legislation establishes a merit-based incentive payment system for physicians, with a scorecard for each professional. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services evaluate quality of care with clinical performance measures and have used these metrics for public reporting and payment to dialysis facilities. Similar metrics may be used for the future merit-based incentive payment system. In nephrology, most clinical performance measures measure processes and intermediate outcomes of care. These metrics were developed from population studies of best practice and do not identify opportunities for individualizing care on the basis of patient characteristics and individual goals of treatment. The In-Center Hemodialysis (ICH) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey examines patients' perception of care and has entered the arena to evaluate quality of care. A balanced scorecard of quality performance should include three elements: population-based best clinical practice, patient perceptions, and individually crafted patient goals of care.

Keywords: clinical performance measures; dialysis; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Levin N, Eknoyan G, Pipp M, Steinberg E: National Kidney Foundation: Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative--development of methodology for clinical practice guidelines. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12: 2060–2063, 1997 - PubMed
    1. Eknoyan G, Levin NW, Eschbach JW, Golper TA, Owen WF, Jr, Schwab S, Steinberg EP, Baylor College of Medicine. Renal Research Institute. Beth Israel Hospital Center. Minor & James Medical Center. Vanderbilt University. Duke University Medical Center. Covance Health Economics and Outcomes Services. Johns Hopkins University. National Kidney Foundation’s Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative : Continuous quality improvement: DOQI becomes K/DOQI and is updated. Am J Kidney Dis 37: 179–194, 2001 - PubMed
    1. Uhlig K, Macleod A, Craig J, Lau J, Levey AS, Levin A, Moist L, Steinberg E, Walker R, Wanner C, Lameire N, Eknoyan G: Grading evidence and recommendations for clinical practice guidelines in nephrology. A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 70: 2058–2065, 2006 - PubMed
    1. Smith KA, Hayward RA: Performance measurement in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 225–234, 2011 - PubMed
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle. Available at: http://healthit.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessme.... Accessed July 17, 2015

MeSH terms